2002 Matthew Kangas:
"Repetition of common elements -- as in the Chihuly -- is copied by Flora C. Mace and Joey Kirkpatrick, a collaborative, two-woman team that pioneered drawing on glass early on. "Backyard Bird" pitchers are lined up in a row on three shelves (three per shelf). The nine pitchers, each with a single Washington state bird illustration, are appealing, but reinforce rather than violate any existing traditions of functional craft...
...Even more conservative and unadventurous is blowpipe genius Dante Marioni, who crams his exquisite cobalt-blue goblets into a yellow shadow box or puts clear glasses into a clear Plexiglas box.
...Richard Marquis at least uses the shadow box to push repetition to an extreme, alluding dangerously to the historic knickknack status of glass. Setting virtuosic smaller balls, cups, mugs, vases and bottles into backdrops of thrift-shop Americana scenes, the 58-year-old Whidbey Island resident best handles the show's theme."
"SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIRED," through Feb. 23, 2003 at Tacoma Museum of Glass.
Kangas, Matthew. "An introduction to mixed-media glass sculptures. " The Seattle Times (Seattle, WA). (Nov 29, 2002): H51. General OneFile. Gale. Seattle Public Library. 1 Apr. 2009. Gale Document Number:CJ94734106.
2002 Joey Kirkpatrick and Flora Mace:


Kirkpatrick, J. and Mace, F. "By Means and Measures" , 2002. http://www.kirkpatrick-mace.com/glassandwoodbig.html
Accessed April 13, 2009.
Kirkpatrick, J. and Mace, F. "Backyard Birds". http://www.kirkpatrick-mace.com/newworkSS2.html.
Accessed April 13, 2009.
2002 Sheila Farr:
"In the long murky tale of the evolution of the Museum of Glass, one thing remains crystal clear: Tacoma can't get enough of Dale Chihuly.
With venues from Union Station to the Tacoma News Tribune to the Swiss Tavern sporting Chihuly glass, a new Chihuly Bridge of Glass and Tacoma Art Museum's large permanent collection, donated by the artist, the city is already bobbing in glass. "TAM has my largest public collection, and I'm going to give more to them," Chihuly says.
And that's not all. A new car museum is in the works, located near the Tacoma Dome, and Chihuly's planning to set up a display there as well. "Well, it's my hometown, and I would work on anything," Chihuly said. "I just told the car museum I would do an installation for free because I really like cars myself."
If he keeps up his largess, Tacoma's cultural center will end up looking like Chihulyland.
Despite all that, Chihuly glass is conspicuously absent from the exhibitions at the new Museum of Glass, which, after all, was originally set to be named after him. What happened?
Chihuly says it was his decision to take his name off the museum, and that it happened about the time he got involved with designing a pedestrian bridge in the mid-1990s.
Once the idea for a Chihuly glass museum took off of its own volition, Chihuly and his former business manager Bryan Ohno (now a Seattle gallery owner) began looking for new projects. They worked out a deal for a dramatic installation at the renovated train station near the Thea Foss Waterway, just across from the site under consideration for the glass museum. Chihuly says glass museum officials weren't too happy about that project: "They thought it would detract from what they were doing," he said. "Then I got involved with the bridge -- at a certain point the city asked me to design a bridge (which later became the Chihuly Bridge of Glass). At that point I said I don't want a museum. It changed to the International Center of Glass."
Director inherits a mess
That's the situation Josie Callan inherited when she took over as director a couple years ago. On one hand, she had the Tacoma business community rallying behind a glass museum that was supposed to spark economic development of the Thea Foss Waterway under the highly marketable Chihuly name. On the other hand, she had a museum with no viable mission and no concrete plans for a collection. She also inherited a building in progress that wasn't paid for and which couldn't make up its mind to be an art museum -- it was designed to glorify the theatrical glass-studio "hotshop."
She also had to contend with a fun-loving artist who rules the limelight and doesn't want to play somebody else's game. "Any director with a strong personality is not gonna want me telling her what to do," Chihuly admits.
That's the mess Callan was hired to fix, and she dived in head first. Meanwhile, things were in flux at the Tacoma Art Museum, too, which is opening a new facility not far from the Museum of Glass in May 2003. And Callan in her enthusiasm was about to set off a chain reaction that led to the dueling museum programs that Tacoma is now trying to overcome.
Overlapping exhibits
In 1999, after attempts to forge a cooperation between the glass museum and Tacoma Artglass museum selected Callan. With a degree in artArt in California, where she was director. Museum failed, both institutions hired new directors to lead them in the high-stakes process of inaugurating their new facilities. The Art in California, where she was director. history and a graduate degree in behavioral sciences, Callan's a pro in arts marketing and management. She came here from the San Jose Museum of
Callan and Chihuly got to be pals years ago, when she booked a show for the glass artist in San Jose. Later, in Italy, she met George Russell, owner of the Tacoma-based international investment company Frank Russell, when they all gathered for the big "Chihuly over Venice" extravaganza. Chihuly and Russell decided Callan had the right stuff to take over the glass museum and move it forward. And Russell was willing to spend the money to lure her here. "There was no way I was moving to Tacoma," Callan said. She was happy with her job and her life in San Jose.
When Callan took charge in January 2000, the museum was adrift. She quickly changed the name to "Museum of Glass: International Center for Contemporary Art," explaining that she wants to place artists who work in glass in the context of international art trends, not to ghettoize them. It was a savvy move.
The problems began when Callan immediately booked -- and started promoting -- "Sounds of the Inner Eye," a show organized for the Kunsthalle Bremen in Germany and more about artglass. Callan did it before hiring her lead curator, Neil Watson, and apparently without considering how it might affect TAM. history than contemporary trends. It features big-name Northwest artists Mark Tobey and Morris Graves but has almost no connection to
Six months before Callan took over the glass museum, TAM had hired Janeanne Upp. Upp was working as chief operating officer at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago, with a background in finance and marketing but no training in art.
When Upp started at TAM, Barbara Johns -- the museum's experienced chief curator and interim director -- stepped back into her old curatorial job but soon resigned. It took Upp two years to hire a replacement.
To fill in, Upp contracted with Sheryl Conkleton, who had a brief, turbulent tenure as chief curator at Seattle's Henry Art Gallery. "We started discussions about an opening exhibition, and out of that came the Big Four," Upp said, referring to Tobey, Graves, Guy Anderson and Kenneth Callahan, the four artists featured in a 1953 LIFE magazine article as the mystic painters of the Northwest. TAM's opening show for its new building will celebrate the 50th anniversary of the LIFE article, a seminal moment in Northwest art history.
Callan said she had no idea that TAM had that show in the works when she lined up "Sounds of the Inner Eye" as her opening exhibit. "I was not aware what their opening shows were going to be. If I'd known that, we'd have had a conversation," Callan said. "We were two years out from opening. We needed a show."
But why choose an exhibition that's primarily about painting as the headliner for the grand opening of a glass museum? "I think it does answer a bit about artists influencing each other," Callan said. "Tobey did work in glass. Graves included glass in his sculpture."
And as far as competition between the two museums is concerned, Callan brushes it off. "I think the word competition is kind of silly. What I would hope is that we complement each other. They're doing a Chihuly installation."
Upp, too, sidesteps questions about competitiveness. "It was an interesting choice, their opening show," said Upp. "We've been here so long ... I think the glass museum has to find their way."
But, on the other hand, when she heard about the glass museum's opening lineup, she was quick to approach Chihuly.
"The director came and asked me to consider, would I do an opening exhibition," Chihuly said. "I knew it would piss off the Museum of Glass. I didn't ask the Museum of Glass. But it's my show, and I'll do what I want to. It's a nice space."
So, now Tacoma has two expensive new museums with similar exhibition lineups and two directors who -- highly qualified in their own ways -- aren't yet well-grounded in the region's art history and the politics of its cultural institutions. Besides, aren't their claws showing a bit?
For the arts community, the problem is economic as well as cultural. Can the two museums generate enough money to survive? It's clear they're both going for local funding, even though the glass museum originally was intended to draw on international sources. It's still $6 million shy of its $48 million building budget. Forty-five percent came from regional sources, 47 percent from national ones and 8 percent from outside the country, according to the museum. A $15 million endowment drive has been temporarily suspended, although a trustee has agreed to donate $750,000 a year for the next five years to make up for that lost income.
The new Tacoma Art Museum, meanwhile, cost $22 million. That's already paid for, and TAM has a small endowment in place, but without acquisitions money the museum has its hand out for donations to its collection.
No economies of scale
What if the two had joined forces instead of competing? The savings of operating under one director and one administrative staff is significant, not to mention marketing and program development costs. The Seattle Art Museum is an example of how one institution can operate in three locations with distinct programming -- the downtown museum, the Asian Art Museum and the projected Olympic Sculpture Park on the downtown waterfront.
"As an outsider looking back in, it would have been wise if we stuck with the original course of action," says former TAM director Chase Rynd about the early discussions to merge the museums. "Your entire staff isn't being duplicated, and you don't have the clash of missions. If I ruled the world, we'd have one fabulous museum (in Tacoma). But what needs to happen now is that any divisiveness has to be got over. It's going to take a tremendous amount of diplomacy."
"Now we have two museums who overlap a little, but that's OK," says Russell, board chairman at the Museum of Glass and its biggest financial supporter. "I don't buy any of this stuff that it can't happen."
And Chihuly?
"What I wanted I got: a really great hotshop," Chihuly says. "That's expensive. That all happened. That's what I fought for." He doesn't see any problem with the Museum of Glass still being a few million in the red for its building. "That's nothing. Believe me, it's not going to shut down. George Russell has deep pockets."
And from the perspective of Michael Sullivan, a Tacoma architectural historian, it will all work out for the best. "We tend to focus on the moment and don't realize it's an event in a much bigger pageant that's going to happen here," he says. "It's like taking off in a thunderstorm: It's a bumpy ride from the start.""
Farr, Sheila. "Fighting for art, money (and Dale Chihuly) A tale of two museums. " The Seattle Times (Seattle, WA). (July 1, 2002): E1. General OneFile. Gale. Seattle Public Library. 1 Apr. 20092002 Sheila Farr:
"This Saturday, on the bank of Tacoma's Thea Foss Waterway, the long-awaited Museum of Glass: International Center for Contemporary Art will open its doors with a show of paintings by Mark Tobey, Morris Graves and John Cage. With it will be "The Inner Light," an exhibit of glass sculpture by Czech artists Stanislav Libenský and Jaroslava Brychtová. Visitors to the museum will cross a flamboyant new Bridge of Glass decorated by Tacoma native son Dale Chihuly.
Next year, near the banks of the Thea Foss Waterway, the long-awaited new Tacoma Art Museum will open with "Northwest Mythology" a show of paintings by Mark Tobey, Morris Graves, Kenneth Callahan and Guy Anderson. Also showing will be a major installation of glass sculptures by ... Dale Chihuly.
For two museums with apparently different purposes to end up with such similar opening lineups is odd, to say the least. The fact that they are sitting in such close proximity in a relatively small city, drawing on many of the same resources and aiming at the same audience makes it stranger still.
So what happened?
With a long history in the region, the Tacoma Art Museum is known for showing 19th- and 20th-century art, with a focus on the Northwest. The Museum of Glass, on the other hand, was conceived 10 years ago as a studio and showcase for the work of superstar glass artist Chihuly.
To the area's business leaders, all this development and excitement along the waterfront creates a rosy picture of a small city fighting its way back from an image blighted by an industrial history of air pollution and arsenic-tainted soil. The two new museums form the crown of a cultural center that stands in what was once a barren tideland, long polluted by industrial waste and bound up in treaty agreements with the Puyallup tribe. Now it's home to a renovated Union Station and the Washington State History Museum, with the University of Washington's Tacoma campus nearby.
But many in the arts community are wondering how the two museums ended up in a neck-and-neck rivalry for patronage and programming. Are they serving the best interests of the public? And how will they avoid the kind of competitive one-upmanship their opening exhibitions signal?
The answers to those questions, along with the underlying reasons for the apparent rivalry, lead through a thicket of politics, big personalities, piles of money and the whims of Tacoma's world-famous glass impresario.
An anchor of glass for downtown
Chihuly lives in Seattle, but he owns four buildings in Tacoma and keeps a staff of 24 working full-time at a warehouse there, crating and shipping glass. His glass sculptures are installed all around the city. Chihuly's mom, Viola, who just turned 95, still lives there in the house where he grew up.
In late summer 1992, Chihuly went to visit Phillip Phibbs at his Tacoma home to talk about a way to start a hotshop studio and glass center in the city where he grew up. Phibbs, who was just retiring from his post as president of the University of Puget Sound, had developed a reputation as an ace fund-raiser, and he liked what Chihuly had to say. "What we really should have is a museum of glass," Phibbs told him.
Phibbs did some research, then took his idea to the Executive Council for a Greater Tacoma, where he found an enthusiastic ally in Tacoma's premier businessman, George Russell. Russell, with his late wife, Jane, ran the investment-consulting and mutual-fund company Frank Russell. The Russells sold the multibillion-dollar firm in 1999. Russell believed the Chihuly museum would anchor a plan to develop the Thea Foss Waterway and be a great way to help revitalize downtown. "We had to bring business people together to see if we couldn't get Tacoma to stop turning its lights off at 5," he said.
Over the next 10 years, their plan for the Chihuly Museum of Glass would morph through several different names and missions, but right from the start there was discussion about what its relationship would be with the Tacoma Art Museum.
'The powers-that-be decided'
When Chase Rynd took over as director of TAM in 1993, talks were already under way to develop a new glass wing for the museum. "I'm not sure where it originated," Rynd said by phone from Tennessee, where he is now director at the Frist Gallery of Art in Nashville. "But that was the original plan from my tenure, to have a large glass component to the museum."
TAM already owned a permanent display of Chihuly's glass and still has the largest museum collection of his work, most donated by the artist.
One of Rynd's first assignments as director was to start fund-raising for a badly needed new facility for the museum, which had been housed, since 1972, in an outmoded and ill-equipped former bank building downtown. Rynd got the capital campaign under way almost immediately. At first there was much talk of the Chihuly Glass Center being a joint effort with TAM. "There were endless discussions," Rynd said. "The dialogue went on for months, years." Rynd wouldn't give specifics about why it didn't work out.
"The best I can say is that the powers-that-be decided it would be better to split off," Rynd said. "We were on track to do this as a single institution."
When that decision was made for the museums to go their separate ways, Rynd said it came with a promise that the glass museum would not raise money locally. "That was the commitment that was made: George Russell would raise money through his international contacts."
TAM also was assured that its focus on 19th- and 20th-century art and Northwest regionalism wouldn't be impacted.
Michael Sullivan, former manager of the city's cultural division, however, believes the glass museum was geared toward independence from the start. "The glass museum emerged pretty much fully developed," he said. "I think (the Russells) may have flirted with the idea of merging it, but I think they wanted a more singular expression. I think the glass museum had its own trajectory."
A bridge that goes nowhere
The quick rise and fall of a spectacular public-works/public-art project — the 12th Street Bridge — helps illustrate the influence Chihuly and his backers had on the shifting tectonics of Tacoma city planning. When TAM was looking at a downtown expansion site, Sullivan introduced a plan by a pair of brilliant Russian architects for a pedestrian bridge from the foot of 12th Street down to the shore of the Thea Foss Waterway, opening up the inaccessible downtown waterfront for public use.
Alexander Brodsky and Ilya Utkin's model for the bridge, exhibited at Seattle's Henry Art Gallery in the mid-1990s, was a gorgeous thing, hearkening back to Tacoma's past as a railroad and lumber town. Beginning where 12th Street dead-ends downtown, it would carry pedestrians to one of the city's most stunning viewpoints, then lead them on a thrilling descent through a glass-enclosed tunnel to the waterfront below. Much of the funding for the bridge was in place, and Sullivan was confident the project was a go. The model and drawings were getting enthusiastic coverage by the Seattle press.
One thing the Russians' bridge didn't have, however, was Chihuly. And Chihuly was happy to hitch his name to another bridge project closer to the new Glass Museum. This bridge, several blocks from the other proposed site, would route visitors to the museum from the newly renovated Union Station. (Which, not coincidentally, was getting a flashy installation by Chihuly). The bridge would be called the Chihuly Bridge of Glass, designed by an architect and embellished with a permanent Chihuly installation.
Suddenly, the city dropped the Brodsky and Utkin bridge plan like a hot brick.
Chihuly said he always thought the Russian architects had a good design. "I was all for it. I think it would be great if they'd still do it," he said, although he did admit that some of the money for it was appropriated for his project. "I think it was only a million," he said.
The city ended up paying $3.7 million for the Arthur W. Andersson-designed Chihuly Bridge of Glass, some 30 percent over its original budget, according to a story in the Tacoma News Tribune. Chihuly says he got $3 million, paid for by the Museum of Glass, for creating the bridge's glass and plastic installations. He recently asked that it not be named after him, but the city overruled him.
One last try
In 1999, Rynd left Tacoma Art Museum for his new job in Nashville. TAM's widely respected head curator, Barbara Johns, stepped up as acting director while the board began a nationwide search for Rynd's replacement. During that time, with TAM still trying to secure a site for its new building, talks resumed to determine whether TAM and the Museum of Glass could somehow join forces. That meant anything "from sharing a receptionist to a full merger," Johns said.
TAM had selected Antoine Predock as its project architect, and the Museum of Glass was working with Arthur Erickson, who had also designed George Russell's Tacoma home.
"My wife funded a special study about four years ago to see how these institutions could blend or merge," said Russell, board chair at the Museum of Glass. But after extensive talks, the two sets of trustees still couldn't see eye to eye. "We had a new board, and the Tacoma Art Museum is a hundred years old. The two boards couldn't be on the same page."
Within a half-year, both boards selected new directors to lead them through the final phases of their capitol campaigns and polish the image of their new institutions.
That's when the competition began.
Tomorrow in Northwest Life: How two museums ended up with the same artists, how they're trying to move forward, and how Dale Chihuly got what he wanted."
Farr, S. "Glass houses: Tacoma's Museum of Glass is ready to open this week." June 30, 2002. The Seattle Times. website accessed June 4, 2009. http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20020630&slug=glass30
Having started his career in 1945 as a teacher at a vocational school in the Czech glass-making center Novy Bor, Mr. Libensky was inseparable, artistically and personally, from Ms. Brychtova. They went on to influence generations of glass makers in Europe, Japan and the United States.
His massive colored glass castings are scattered around Prague, where they are an integral part of many public works, from the facade of the National Theater to the windows of St. Vitus Cathedral. In the United States, his works are in the collections of several museums, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Corning Museum of Glass in Corning, N.Y.
A retrospective of the Libenskys' work is at the 20th century Art Collection of the National Gallery in Prague and will be the first exhibition at the new Museum of Glass in Tacoma, Wash. The show will open there on July 4.
''He was the most important glass artist of our time,'' said Thomas Buechner, the founding director of the Corning Museum. ''He elevated glass to the level of major architectural sculpture.''
''Alchemy'' was how Mr. Libensky impishly described the process of creating the huge forms of solid color for which he and his wife were known. The truth lay deeper, in Mr. Libensky's rigorous classical training and in the deep and close artistic cooperation with his wife, which lasted nearly half a century.
The two met at the Zelezny Brod glass-making school, which had been founded by Ms. Brychtova's father. The town, about 60 miles from Prague, has been a glass-making center for centuries.
''When I came to Zelezny Brod, I made a drawing of a head that was shaped like a bowl,'' Mr. Libensky recalled in an interview. ''Ms. Brychtova came and said, 'Mr. Libensky, may I turn this drawing into something three-dimensional?' I said 'Yes, try it,' and she tried so successfully that we continued to work together. It worked because I trained as a painter and she trained as a sculptor.''
The couple first came to world attention at the Czech pavilion of the 1958 World's Fair in Brussels, with their flagstone-size colored glass panels with reverse reliefs of animals. The crackdown that followed the 1948 Communist putsch in Czechoslovakia had ravaged the country's art world, but had curiously left the door open for glass artists, who were seen as politically acceptable artisans. Orders soon came for glass pieces to adorn factories and hotels.
''Art went in through the back door,'' Ms. Brychtova recalled.
But politics was never far behind. Inspired by the Prague Spring reform movement of the late 1960's, the Libenskys began ''The River of Life,'' a huge glass artwork that was a tribute to Czechoslovakia's struggle for freedom in the 20th Century.
It was shown at the 1970 World's Fair in Osaka, Japan, but by then hard-line Communists were beginning a belated crackdown on artists after the Soviet Union's 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia, and censors ordered the Libenskys to sandblast Soviet Army bootprints from the work. When they returned home from Osaka, the Libenskys' reputation was assured, but they were expelled from the Communist Party and forbidden to travel abroad together.
The international exposure brought the couple to the attention of the young American glass artist Dale Chihuly, who was then studying in Venice. On a whim, Mr. Chihuly traveled to Zelezny Brod and called on the Libenskys unannounced. Mr. Chihuly, perhaps America's most prominent glass artist, invited them to the Pilchuk [sic] glass school in Washington State.
''What he brought, what was really important, was that his interest was in art,'' not in glass simply as a craft, Mr. Chihuly said of Mr. Libensky's approach.
At home, Mr. Libensky was highly regarded as a teacher. ''He insisted that we learn classical techniques, how to paint and sculpt with the light of nature,'' said Marian Karel, a prominent Czech glass artist. ''It was two years before we ever touched glass.''
Short and rotund with an elfish grin and a warm, bubbling personality, Mr. Libensky was also a bit of a showman, given to greeting students and lecture audiences with outstretched arms and a cry of ''fantasticky.''
He was thrown out of the academy by the Communists in 1987, and never returned to full-time teaching. Instead, he traveled widely and sold many works abroad.
Near the end of his life, Mr. Libensky, formerly a pack-a-day smoker, was told he had lung cancer. His work shifted from the vibrant greens, blues and reds he had been using to heavy grays and deep browns. His last major work, a series of eight-foot-tall, vestmentlike sculptures in a thick, translucent gray, were inspired, Ms. Brychtova said, by the X-rays of his own body that Mr. Libensky saw so many times during his battle with cancer."
No comments:
Post a Comment