Tuesday, September 8, 2009

2008 part five

In this time line I pull quotes to illustrate a thread in popular and scholarly writing and criticism about glass. Here we will see current glass artists defending their art against the accusations and separating themselves from these stereotypes and, hopefully, find out how and where the now-common opinion was born. Fundamentally, the general thesis seems to be born of the question, What Is Art? This question I will leave to others to answer, here I am only documenting the written history of a popular way of thinking and a popular taste.

2008 Lisa Fondo:

"
Glass and metal art are not the first mediums that come to mind when considering an art gallery's offerings. However, many galleries have round that carrying these niche mediums has been a profitable investment that bas diversified their sales and overall clientele.

Although glass and metal art are sometimes considered crafts, and its practitioners craftsman, the work by the fine artists in this article certainly challenges the generalization.

Craft Vs. Fine Art

The debate continues among many gallery owners and artists as to the distinction between craftsman and artist. "We straddle the line of art and craft, engineering and design," says Angelique Jackson of Jancik Arts International. "Craft is round in the shop drawings and glass and metal frame fabrications while art is found in the interpretations and results."

Livia V. Garson of Glass Place Gallery in Jackson Hole, Wyo., has been specializing in glass art sculptures since the 1980s when artists working behind the Iron Curtain were able to introduce their work to American galleries and collectors. She is of the opinion that glass art offers a myriad of possibilities for an artist and gallery. "The glass medium gives infinite possibilities to be played with; the tire of life is given the chance by artists to create new and unique pieces each day, from classic to contemporary shapes."

Dale Chihuly is arguably the best known, living glass artist in the world. He is an interior designer, ceramic artist and painter, but it is his work in the medium of glass that has garnered the most acclaim. Chihuly offered the following advice to anyone considering a career as a glass artist in the fine-art realm. "I would tell them to figure out what they want to do," he says. "Do they want to be an artist, designer, or do they want to be a craftsman? Naturally, the hardest thing to be is an artist."

The Transition to Fine Art

Initially a student of interior design and architecture, Chihuly realized he wanted to concentrate instead on glass. Chihuly enrolled in the University of Wisconsin's hot glass program--the first of its kind in the United States--established by Harvey K. Littleton, founder of the Studio Glass Movement. After receiving a degree in sculpture, Chihuly enrolled in the ceramics department at Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) and later established the renowned glass program at RISD.

"Back when I first started, I wanted to get a job as a professor, which I got at RISD, so that allowed me to have a glass shop and earn an income and be able to do my own work," he explains. "Some professors can do that, but some can't; it is not an easy thing to do."

Artist Max Gold, known as "The Father of Fusion Art," began his career as a glass artist for a more pragmatic reason. "I ran out of canvas, and there were some sheets of glass in the apartment building I was living in; I loved the way the reverse painting looked," Gold says.

The process then evolved into something different--sculptures that merge digital art and original reverse glass paintings. "My first glass sculptures came about a few years later when I would layer multiple sheets of painted glass; I only painted about 20 percent of each sheet, negative space was as important as the painted part."

Metal artist Jason Mernick started his career working in glass but made the transition to metal. "I like the element of tire in my creative process--there's no hesitation," he says. "I have been given credit in the industry for developing 'torch painting;' that is, I use tire the way painters use paint."

From Concept to Finished Works

Working in hard metals and glass can prove challenging, at times, for fine artists.

Mernick works with stainless steel, aluminum and copper at his studio in Lake Mathews, Calif. The designs he produces are free flowing and spontaneous. "I just begin, and the process takes me," he explains. "One thing leads to another. The keys are knowing when to stop and how one works with spontaneous developments."

Chihuly works with hand-picked teams in his Seattle studio to create works of art that vary in scale from small free-flowing pieces to large-scale installations that require serious planning.

Jancik Arts International provides large pieces for corporate and private clients. Known for its stained-glass domes, most pieces require strict specifications. "The right and left sides of our brains need to work together in order to create a work with structural integrity; we must use calculus to determine the surface area of a curved dome," Jackson says.

Brad Lorang, a metal sculptor from Oregon, incorporates various techniques, including engraving and heat-applied patinas, to create textural and reflective effects on the metal.

"The work I am now doing has really been more than a 30-year process of adapting techniques I learned along the way for my own specific purposes; each new corner I turned has taken my work a little further off the beaten path," Lorang says.

Defining Form and Function

Las Vegas-based artist Dale Mathis creates high-relief wall sculptures that challenge and defy many physical and artistic boundaries. A typical Mathis artwork is mechanical with hand-carved, moving gears and neon-lit areas. Weighing 80 pounds or more, the metallic mixed-media sculptures are created with what the artist has dubbed a Steampunk style.

"Steampunk is a mixture of old and new, Victorian era meets today," Mathis explains. "It's a blending of different forms and ideas, materials and function. I'm an artist and an engineer."

Artist Henry Jerome has also taken a unique approach to the functionality of his work. He has made a townhouse his personal gallery, allowing potential clients to view his glass and granite works in a home setting.

Works by many fine glass and metal artists can be found in private collections while corporate collections, museums and sculpture gardens hold pieces of monumental scale.

Translation to Sales

Maggie Munro, owner of Munro Gallery in San Diego, uses the glass art she features in her display window as a way to attract a diverse clientele into her store. She came across some fine-art glass and jewelry at an industry trade show a few years back and began carrying it in her gallery as a way to pick up some additional income and diversify her clientele. The initiative took off, bringing her an increase in holiday buyers and purchases from homeowners, corporations and interior designers.

Kelly's Fine Art Gallery in Joseph, Ore., has been offering hand-blown glass and metal art, in addition to bronze sculpture and paintings, for the past 10 years. Owner Kelly Wick began offering the two niche mediums as a way to add more color and variety to her offerings. She says glass and metal art appeal to collectors with contemporary and more rustic home settings and offers the following advice when selling these genres.

"For glass, proper lighting is very important," she explains. "I recently purchased a well-lit display case for some of my glass, and my sales went up significantly. Selling glass and metal require a personalized sales approach, like any other type of art. I stay in tune to what the client is interested in, tell them why I love the artwork and get excited about it with them.""

Fondo, Lisa. "Glass & metal art: in a time when new business is paramount, these niche mediums offer glaring possibilities." Art Business News. November 1, 2008. Retrieved November 05, 2009 from accessmylibrary: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-35970592_ITM

2008 Lotta Lewenhaupt.

The Swedish jury for Elle Deco’s seventh annual EDIDA/ELLE Deco International Design Awards has presented its choice: Kosta Boda designer Åsa Jungnelius is 2008 Designer of the Year.

Lotta Lewenhaupt, editor-in-chief of Swedish Elle Interiör, writes:

“Suggestive is a word that often comes up when describing Åsa Jungnelius’s works. With good reason: thought-provoking and beguiling, most everything Åsa does sends out double signals. And this is often extremely intentional; she likes to challenge and question conventions such as what is true or false, ugly or attractive. As always, the answer is in the eye of the beholder. For example, Åsa has her own way of commenting on phenomena such as consumerism and shopping, expressed even before she was hired at Kosta Boda in the form of a giant glass lipstick with obvious references to brand-name tubes. Once at Kosta Boda she continued with her Make Up series, which includes oversized bottles of nail polish and a serving dish with a relief pattern very reminiscent of the oft-imitated logo of a certain purse brand.

“Just like their creator, everything that Åsa makes is clear and confident. She is consistent; she follows her own path and has done so since she left school at 17 to become an apprentice glassblower at the National School of Glass in Orrefors. The addictive, intoxicating effect of glass as a material becomes evident when we see that Åsa has also worked in blowing rooms in the UK, Italy, Kenya and the United States (Pilchuck) over the years. In 2004 she earned a degree from the Ceramics & Glass department of the University College of Arts, Crafts and Design in Stockholm. Her degree exhibition featured, among other things, a pair of transparent glass stiletto shoes and a crystal chandelier, which later appeared in Liljevalch’s Formbart exhibition in 2005, along with a pair of candlesticks that looked like melted wax. The latter is now a part of her Mysstake series at Kosta Boda.”

Åsa received the award at the Elle Interiör design gala in Stockholm on 3 February 2009, and the complete statement of the jury will be published in the February issue of Elle Interiör, which will be released in connection with the Furniture Fair in Stockholm."

Lewenhaupt, L. "Asa Jungnelius named 2008 designer of the year by Elle interior." September 2, 2009. Accessed October 26, 2009. http://www.kostaboda.se/index.php?id=press&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=238&tx_ttnews[backPid]=40&cHash=c832576018


2008
Evan Schauss:

Photobucket

Photo Credit: ABJ Seattle Glass Online

2008 Lisa Orkin Emmanuel:

"
CORAL GABLES, Fla. (AP) --

Artist William Carlson dips the large steel ladle into the blazing furnace and fills it with liquid glass. With sweat pouring down his face, he quickly moves to a graphite mold he has made and pours in the seething yellow-colored liquid.

He is making glass wall tiles with an imprint of fiber knots in them that he will remove with tweezers. This will leave a fossil of the knot. The tiles will then be hung together in a grid format. Carlson says he is trying to start a discourse about language with the way he lays out the fiber.

Glass art is attracting more admirers and collectors today, and gaining more attention as a fine art, as artists explore more with the medium. Meanwhile, prices for pieces are on the rise.

"It's a maturation of the field. More and more we are seeing people interested," said Michael Heller, vice president of the Heller Gallery in New York, where glass art is sold. "More and more collectors have also started to realize the value of work that has integrity."

The artistic content of glass art has developed over the last decade or so, artists say.

"It's kind of coming of age where craft is no longer the title of the work. Craft is the means to an end. ... It really is the strength of the concept and power of the image," says Carlson, who also teaches at the University of Miami in Coral Gables.

Fran Kaufman, director of the contemporary art fair palmbeach3, says the reason glass art is on the rise is because many collectors aren't purchasing just one type of art anymore, but varying the kinds of art they collect. Prices are also getting higher, which is enticing people to buy it.

"Prices getting higher, that is appealing to collectors. People are looking beyond the more traditional glass pieces. ... Collections are not so specific anymore," Kaufman says. "I think the experimentation has grown more."

Mark Lyman, director of the two annual shows called SOFA, which take place in New York and Chicago, says that 10 to 15 years ago an expensive glass piece would cost between $50,000 to $100,000. Now, such works can reach anywhere from $500,000 to $1 million.

"It's a very active market for them," Lyman says of the glass pieces. "It's really come along. ... We're seeing a lot of growth and strength."

In an effort to expand public awareness, collectors Sheldon and Myrna Palley of Miami donated about 100 pieces that they have been amassing since the 1970s to the University of Miami's Lowe Art Museum. The exhibit opened last month.

They say they have about 200 more works at home. The collection at the museum includes a piece by William Morris that looks like a prehistoric artifact with cave paintings on it. Next to it, attached to a metal stand, is a glass shaped to resemble a horn. It was created in 1992. Christina Bothwell's glass yellow baby with ceramic head and extremities also sits on one of the shelves.

Myrna Palley says they scour fairs and work with well-known glass art dealers to decide what they will buy.

"When you go to a cafeteria and there's all this food, how do you know what to pick?" Myrna Palley says of her experience buying glass art. "It just calls me."

Sheldon Palley says the feeling of power in Tom Patti's small glass objects really pull him to them.

"It's very architectural. They are like huge buildings, even though they are small," he says.

Patti, whose studio is in Pittsfield, Mass., says he also sees an increased interest in glass art.

"I think the interest in glass is continuously growing, getting larger," Patti says. "It's been accumulating. It's just something that if the art form is strong, it inherently progresses in many avenues. ... The museums are not just collecting it, they are seeing it as an applied art form that can be incorporated as part of the building itself."

Some artists credit Seattle-based Dale Chihuly for getting their art more publicity. His colorful glass works have reached audiences across the United States and throughout the world.

Studio glass was introduced into college programs in the 1960s and then increasingly explored by students. It really started being considered art after 1960 when artists began to work in their own studios and not in factories. Around the same time, a non-industrial glass furnace was created, which opened up opportunities for creative use, artist Carlson says.

Now, a common recipe for the material is sand or silica mixed with sodium carbonate, lime, magnesium carbonate and any additives that may change the color.

Wisconsin-based artist Beth Lipman, who creates glass still lifes inspired by Dutch, German and Italian paintings of the 1600s, says she feels a definite shift in the way her art is perceived.

"I think people are kind of hungry for more of a dialogue," Lipman says. "There is this overall shift of looking at the capitalist community that we're living in and being mindful about what you are using your money for."

(This version CORRECTS city of Tom Patti's studio to 'Pittsfield, Mass.')"

Emmanuel, L.O. "Glass art is attracting more collectors." June 27, 2008. San Francisco Chronicle. accessed September 8, 2009. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/06/27/entertainment/e130950D25.DTL

2008 Pauline Dubkin Yearwood:

"Visitors to the 15th-anniversary SOFA Chicago (Sculptural Objects & Functional Art Fair) at Navy Pier will view a spectacular installation in glass, among other always-impressive works from 100 galleries in 16 countries. "Chandelier" encompasses three of those objects and many others besides and is a visual meditation on no less a theme than the opposing pull of the good and evil sides of human beings.

A Tel Aviv showroom, Litvak Gallery, is spending $100,000 on the installation by Italian glass artist Lucio Bubacco.

How an Israeli gallery came to represent one of the top Italian glass artists in the world at first seems a puzzle, but Orit Topuol, a gallery spokesperson, explained it all in an e-mail exchange from Tel Aviv.

"The Litvak Gallery was established in 2006 by Muly Litvak, an art collector and Internet entrepreneur," she writes. "The gallery supports new and leading artists and assists them by promoting their work internationally." It also commissions large-scale projects from well-known "master artists" and commits to promoting them internationally, she writes.

As for the SOFA installation, titled "Eternal Temptation," Topuol writes that "Muly Litvak is an avid glass collector. His personal collection incorporates pieces from some of the world's leading glass artists, including Lucio Bubacco, one of (his) favorites. Since Bubacco is a master glass artist and is represented solely by Litvak Gallery, the two decided to collaborate on a project."

Bubacco, born in the Italian city of Murano, where he still lives, has been a glass artist since age 15 and is considered one of the world's foremost proponents of the "lume" glass technique, which involves hand-forming figures in glass and incorporating them in blown and cast vessels. He draws his imagery from Greek, Roman and Byzantine art and medieval and Renaissance theater, and often treats classic themes like love, birth, death, heaven and hell, according to a recent catalogue.

Mark Lyman, SOFA's founder and director, writes in an introduction to the show that the Litvak installation "personally raises the bar for the SOFA Fairs and at the same time matches the extraordinary surreal artistry of Bubacco."

Visitors to last year's SOFA who marveled at American glass artist Dale Chilhuly's spectacular chandelier might imagine "Eternal Temptation" to be similar, but Topuol, the gallery spokesperson, says it is not. Chilhuly's chandeliers, she writes, "are created using an entirely different technique. ... Bubacco uses lampworking to create his pieces, with each piece figuratively expressing specific topics and themes."

"Eternal Temptation" is composed of 15 major pieces, each containing dozens of elements, she writes. The centerpiece is a representation of "Man on his Journey through Life" with scenes of "Inferno" (hell) and "Paradiso" (heaven). Three chandeliers also represent Inferno, Paradiso and "the artist's fantasy chandelier." On the periphery are four vases, two depicting Inferno and two Paradiso along with five "watchers," all surrounding the centerpiece.

In the piece, Bubacco "shows his greatness as a surrealist figurative artist, with phenomenal human body sculpting, architectural instinct, and dramatic skill, combined to make an unforgettable impression on the viewer," Topuol writes.

"Eternal Temptation," she continues, "simply stretches the lampworking technique to its limits. (The piece) deals with ambitious topics, focusing on existential and moral dilemmas without taking a stand. Good and evil, paradise and inferno are portrayed as both tempting and threatening by the artist. In 'Eternal Temptation' Bubacco poses the ultimate question of the human dilemma: with the duality of good and evil evident in every direction, which path is the right path to take, and does the path we take even matter in the end?"

A catalogue description of "Eternal Temptation" calls it "a combination of architecture ... and theater. (Bubacco's) architecture is constructed by means of a series of extended vessel forms, chalices, goblets, vases and chandeliers; his theater by means of a cast of many hundreds of small figures who enact the story of Eternal Temptation played out simultaneously in heaven and hell."

Unlike most of the works shown at SOFA, "Eternal Temptation" is not for sale. Later Bubacco and the Litvak Gallery will select eight scenes from the piece, from which the artist will crate "variations" that will be offered for sale, Topuol writes. She adds that while the piece is making its debut at SOFA, it will eventually be exhibited at other fine art fairs and museums as well as at the gallery.

Meanwhile SOFA celebrates its 15th year with its biggest fair yet, giving viewers a look at art objects from galleries as far-flung as Argentina and China. The United States is represented by 14 Chicago galleries, among many others. Special exhibits, besides "Eternal Temptation" and other works in glass by Bubacco, include more work from the Association of Israel's Decorative Arts and a celebration of the Racine (Wisconsin) Art Museum.

A special exhibit will feature works by Israeli artists Yael Herman, Noa Hagiladi, Rory Hooper, Alon Meron and Noa Nadir. The entire exhibit will be housed in a one-of-a-kind cavelike structure designed by architect Guy Zucker, a first-of-its-kind exhibit at SOFA.

In addition, a lecture series featuring museum curators, professional art advisors, artists, collectors, interior designers, critics and art market journalists will take place throughout the duration of the show (visit www.sofaexpo.com for schedules).

The artwork on display ranges from Japanese ceramics to hollowware by Scandinavian silversmiths to contemporary furniture to avant-garde American and European jewelry and much more. but-in answer to a question that still gets asked-no sofas."

Yearwood, P.D. "Glass that shatters expectations: Israeli gallery goes beyond the chandelier." Chicago Jewish News. November 7, 2008. Accessed November 2, 2009. http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?sid=7&id=252443

2008 Bill Van Siclen:

"

The first thing you see as you enter “Chihuly at RISD,” the sometimes dazzling but ultimately disappointing Dale Chihuly exhibition at Rhode Island School of Design, isn’t one of the artist’s flamboyant blown-glass sculptures. Instead, it’s a copy of Chihuly’s signature blown up to billboard size and rendered in a swirling semi-abstract scrawl.

As it turns out, it’s a strangely appropriate way to start the show, which opens Saturday at RISD’s new Chace Center complex on North Main Street.

For one thing, the free-form twists and turns in Chihuly’s signature look a lot like the free-form twists and turns in his sculptures. And the color of the signature — a venomous shade of acid-green — seems appropriate for an artist whose titles (among them, Citron-Spotted Ebony Venetian with Coiled Lilies and Black Basket Set with Cadmium Orange Lip Wraps) often read like shopping lists for a color-crazed Impressionist.

Unfortunately, Chihuly’s super-sized John Hancock is also appropriate in less flattering ways.

As much a showman as he is an artist, Chihuly is best known for his large blown-glass sculptures — dramatic works whose lush colors and fluid shapes often evoke shells, flowers, baskets and other organic forms. During the 1970s and ’80s, these eye-catching, technically challenging pieces helped rekindle interest in glass as a medium for serious contemporary artists.

Along the way, Chihuly, a Tacoma, Wash., native who graduated from RISD in 1968 (with a master’s degree in ceramics) and later founded the school’s studio-glass program, became the most famous American glass artist since Louis Comfort Tiffany.

In recent years, however, Chihuly has spent much of his time seeking ever larger and more grandiose stages for his work. In 1995, a Chihuly-led team of glassmakers transformed the streets, bridges and canals of Venice into a giant outdoor glass gallery. The result, dubbed Chihuly Over Venice, also spawned a coffee table book and a video documentary.

Other high-profile projects include the lobby ceiling of the Bellagio casino in Las Vegas and Chihuly at the V & A, a 2001 installation at London’s Victoria and Albert Museum.

While these projects have helped introduce Chihuly’s work to a wider public, they’ve also taken a toll on his reputation. A 1999 survey of American art critics, for example, ranked Chihuly in the top 10 in both the “name recognition” and “most overrated” categories.

More recently, a prominent West Coast critic (Kenneth Baker of the San Francisco Chronicle) slammed Chihuly for indulging in “empty virtuosity” and mere “decoration.” (Ouch!)

The result is a kind of mid-career stalemate, in which Chihuly and his work remain hugely popular with everyday museum-goers while eliciting yawns — or worse — from a growing number of artists and critics (and, it must be said, from many of Chihuly’s fellow glassmakers).

It’s a pattern that “Chihuly at RISD,” which features about a dozen large sculptural ensembles as well as a smattering of smaller works, seems likely to repeat.

After making their way past the king-size “Chihuly” signature, the first thing visitors see is a smaller version of the famous glass-filled ceiling at the Bellagio Resort. In many ways, it’s a great way to start the show. Not only does it evoke one of Chihuly’s most famous artworks — the Bellagio ceiling — but it introduces many of the artistic concerns — lush color, the transformative properties of light, sensuous form — that have occupied him throughout his career.

If you’ve never experienced a Chihuly exhibit before, prepare to be dazzled.

On the other hand, if you have seen a Chihuly show before, you may have a different reaction: déjà vu. Indeed, ceiling installations have become something of a staple at Chihuly exhibits — the equivalent of a rock band kicking off a concert with a couple of crowd-pleasing oldies.

Next up: a huge wall filled with the poster-size “drawings” Chihuly likes to make in between glass-blowing sessions. Here again, casual museum-goers will probably be impressed by the sheer scale of the installation, which suggests a cross between a Jackson Pollock painting and an IMAX screen. On the other hand, there’s a lot more doodling than drawing in these pieces, most of which look as if they were tossed off in a few seconds.

Next, it’s on to one of the show’s highlights: a trio of blown-glass chandeliers. Though Chihuly has been making these show-stopping works for a long time now, the ones at RISD, all of which were completed in 2008, are among the best I’ve seen — visually striking and inventive, yet surprisingly elegant and understated (at least by Chihuly’s standards).

Then again, “understated” is not a word I’d use to describe to Mille Fiori, one of several large installation-style pieces in the exhibition. Located in the same area as the chandeliers, Mille Fiori consists of dozens of tube-shaped glass sculptures that seem to sprout, like a crop of mutant tulips, from a mirrored black floor.

The result is quintessential Chihuly — technically challenging, dramatically presented and beautiful to look at, yet with more than a hint of calculated slickness and showmanship. Indeed, you could also imagine Mille Fiori and its two companion installations — the lilac-hued Neodymium Reeds and the neon-lit Glass Forest — as high-end Christmas-window displays.

Museum visitors will also find several displays devoted to Chihuly’s smaller table-top sculptures, including examples of his Venetians, Baskets and Navajo Blanket Cylinders series.

Of these, the Venetians make the strongest impression, perhaps because they represent Chihuly at his most flamboyant and over-the-top. (Chihuly being Chihuly?) The pieces from the Baskets and Navajo Blanket series, meanwhile, all date from 2008, suggesting that Chihuly has begun mining his past work in much the same way that aging rock stars mine their back catalogs.

Meanwhile, Chihuly’s influence on other glassmakers is the focus of “Studio Glass in Rhode Island: The Chihuly Years,” a small companion exhibit installed just outside the Chace Center’s main gallery.

Besides giving props to some local talent — many of the artists are based in Rhode Island — the show highlights the diversity of contemporary art glass, with some artists emphasizing fluid shapes and colors (Toots Zynsky), others referencing art history (James Watkins) and still others treating glass as an offshoot of minimalist sculpture (Steven Weinberg, Howard Ben Tre).

The show also features several older Chihuly sculptures, including one of the original Navajo Blanket Cylinders that helped launch the artist’s career back in the mid-1970s. Though small and nearly colorless by Chihuly’s current standards, it has a freshness and unassuming beauty that’s missing from many of his more recent works. Indeed, it may be the best Chihuly of the bunch."

Van Siclen, B. "Chihuly glass dazzles, with a touch of deja vu." Sept. 25, 2008. Acc. November 2, 2009. http://www.projo.com/art/content/wk-artscene25_09-25-08_VJBM3P4_v18.323c1e.html

1984 part two

In this time line I pull quotes to illustrate a thread in popular and scholarly writing and criticism about glass. Here we will see current glass artists defending their art against the accusations and separating themselves from these stereotypes and, hopefully, find out how and where the now-common opinion was born. Fundamentally, the general thesis seems to be born of the question, What Is Art? This question I will leave to others to answer, here I am only documenting the written history of a popular way of thinking and a popular taste.

1984 Dean Jensen:

"Wausau, Wis. –The glass artist still doesn’t get much respect. In the hierarchy of the art world, he seems to rank just a rung or two above the artisans who tool leather belts.

Oh, there have been times when museums of the stature of Washington’s Corcoran Gallery of Art or New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art mount surveys of contemporary studio glass. But such shows are very rare and excite little interest outside glass circles. Rarely, if ever, are glass artists taken seriously enough to be represented in such prestigious derbies as the Whitney Biennial or the Venice Bienale.

Like glass artists, potters and fiber artists used to be viewed by the art world as pariahs, mere craftsmen who really did not qualify for the honorific of artist. By bringing the visions of their towering imaginations into contact with their chosen media, ceramists like Peter Voulkos and Robert Arneson and weavers like Lenore Tawney and Claire Zeisler demonstrated that it is at least possible for works in clay and fiber to hold their own with painting, sculpture and photography.

Some glass artists say their medium hasn’t yet gained the recognition of painting or sculpture because the studio glass movement is still comparatively young. There could be some validity to their argument. As recently as 25 years ago, almost all art glass was mass-produced in factories. Then in the early 1960s, ceramist Harvey Littleton established glassblowing facilities at the University of Wisconsin and showed that technology had advanced to the point where individuals could create glass art in their own studios. Universities across the country followed suit in establishing glass programs and the studio glass movement was born

If the relatively low esteem of glass artists can be explained by the newness of studio glass movement, though, this would seem to be only part of the story. One might learn of another big reason for the low estate of contemporary glass by visiting ‘Americans in Glass, a show organized by the Leigh Yawkey Woodson Art Museum in Wausau that will continue at the Woodson through July 8.

Among the show’s more than 60 exhibitors are Dale Chihuly, Marvin Lipofsky, Littleton, Joel Philip Myers and Thomas Patti—artists who are as much venerated by contemporary glass connoisseurs as Jasper Johns and Willem de Kooning are by painting enthusiasts. For all of the admiration these artists might hold in glass circles, though, not one produces work that has anything close to the impact of, say, one of Voulkos’ monumental forms in clay or one of Zeisler’s great constructions of braided, woven and crocheted yarns.

Most of the work in ‘Americans in Glass’ seems to fall into one of two categories—pure decoration or restatements of expressions that have already been made and remade in other media. The studio glass movement seems to be waiting for some messianic figure of the force and originality of a Voulkos who could smash all of the shibboleths of glass art and deliver its makers from the esthetically arid land they now habitate.


What this exhibition does well, though, is demonstrate the seemingly magical property of glass to take on the qualities of just about any other substance. Flo Perkins, for example, seems to have metamorphosed glass into spiky cacti. Chihuly, who well may be the greatest master among glass artists, seems to have transmuted glass into a living, organic material in a ravishing work that, in its form and rich and varied colors, suggests some great sea creature. And in Mary Shaffer’s sculpture, ‘Mamore,’ the glass spilling from an iron block has the look of cool, clear water.

While one might be momentarily wowed by the alchemy these artists practiced, their works really do not engage the mind. The primary message of their art seems to be about the transmutability of glass.

There is a clunkiness about Christian M. Schiess’ ‘igna Serrata’ that is hard to love. The work resembles a transparent plastic pillow that is stuffed with a large, rainbow-colored and bacon-like strip of glass. But there is something compelling about the work because it seems to transform light into tangible form.

Also arresting is James C. Watkin’s wall relief ‘Still Life,’ an arrangement of three simple vessels. Glass artist William Warmus, one of the judges for the show, accurately states in the show’s catalog that the Watkins’ work conveys the magical spirit of Giorgio Morandi painting.

Probably Italo Scanga has created the most jolting works—pedestals on which rest wine bottles and primitively conceived human heads. Scanga, an artist who is better known as a sculptor and painter than a glassblower, seems intent on renouncing the glassness of glass in the new-primitive sculptures that are part of what he calls his ‘Funnel Head’ series. He has so heavily slathered his creations with paint that their glassness has disappeared.

The seriousness with which the Woodson museum took on the job of organizing ‘Americans in Glass’ should be evident to all by the caliber of the judges who were selected to make the selections—J. Stewart Johnson, curator at the Museum of Modern Art in New York; William Warmus, a curator at the Corning Museum of Glass, Helmut Ricke, deputy director of the Kunstmuseum in Dusseldorf, West Germany; and Julian Schnabel, who, just now, is probably the most talked-about painter in the United States.

And what is surprising is the frankness with which some of the judges themselves have spoken out in expressing their disappointment in the glass art that is being done to day. Johnson, for example, concluded his catalog essay this way: ‘…It might have been hoped that this exhibition could be a celebration of the mature achievements of the American studio glass movement. Instead, the challenge not having been met, it could be its requiem.’

After closing at the Woodson, the show will travel to museums in 10 European cities.[…]”

Jensen, D. The Milwaukee Sentinel. June 15, 1984. 'Studio glass works fail to break artistic ground.' accessed September 8, 2009. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=gdUVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=OhIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5793,3254550&dq=glass+artist

1984 Barbara Mayer:

[Excerpt] “The public for the work has also increased.  Where once gift buyers and individuals decorating their homes might have been the typical purchasers, today serious collectors tend to make the important purchases.  Prices for art glass have also substantially increased.

Recently the medium has received a boost with the number of glass artists by American museums. Besides the Corning Museum, which owns 21,000 historic and contemporary pieces, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York is known to have acquired work b glass makers such as Harvey Littleton, Dale Chihuly and Michael Glancy, among others.

Other museums interested in glass include the Chrysler in Norfolk, Va., and the San Jose (Calif.) Museum, according to Ruth Summers, a gallery owner in Los Angeles.

Another force in the development of the studio glass movement, according to some authorities, has been the Corning Glass Museum which is part of the Corning Glass Center. Approximately 500,000 people visit the center each year, according to Dwight P. Lanmon, museum director.”


Mayer, Barbara.  AP Newsfeatures.  Kentucky New Era, June 18, 1984.  “Handmade studio glass becoming more popular.”  Accessed June 19, 2010 from Google news archive: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=TPowAAAAIBAJ&sjid=R-AFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3608,6059988&dq=corning+glass+art+society+conference&hl=en

1989 part two

In this time line I pull quotes to illustrate a thread in popular and scholarly writing and criticism about glass. Here we will see current glass artists defending their art against the accusations and separating themselves from these stereotypes and, hopefully, find out how and where the now-common opinion was born. Fundamentally, the general thesis seems to be born of the question, What Is Art? This question I will leave to others to answer, here I am only documenting the written history of a popular way of thinking and a popular taste.

1989 Betty Freudenheim:

"
NINE limp champagne bottles seem to huddle together like weary old ladies with their heads bent down or twisted sideways; some residue of glue from the labels might be their tattered shawls. Nearby stands a life-size glass head of Barbra Streisand with a golden canary in her throat.

There is no trace of Communist social realism in these works by Blanka Adensamova in the exhibition ''Glass Art From Czechoslovakia'' at the Lee Sclar Gallery here. The artist said that after figuring out a way to make bottles slump down without melting into a glob, she used the medium that was handy. ''I like champagne and my friends do too,'' Mrs. Adensamova told Mr. Sclar when he visited her studio in southern Bohemia.

The gallery owner and his wife, Diana, traveled to Czechoslovakia this year to choose 50 works by 21 artists for the current show. That nation's history of glassmaking dates from the early 14th century.

Before leaving, Mr. Sclar made his initial choices from hundreds of slides, books and magazines that he received from Art Centrum, the Czechoslovak Government agency that handles fine-arts exports.

Officials of the agency took the Sclars around the country to visit the artists in their studios. Because the cost of operating a glass furnace is very high, most of these artists do the hot glasswork, the casting and glass blowing, in Novy Bor, a Government factory that also produces functional glassware and scientific equipment.

''Glass artists are doing well by Czech standards,'' Mr. Sclar said. ''An artist who can take in $10,000 to $12,000 in one year may have a country studio and a home in Prague.''

The artists are reimbursed for their sales in hard currency, not Czechoslovak crowns. Art Centrum pays the export costs like shipping and insurance. But Mr. Sclar said the Government agency had ''absolutely no control over design.''

''Czech glass has had a strong influence on American glass artists,'' said Anne Baruch, owner of a Chicago gallery that was among the first to show art glass from Czechoslovakia nine years ago.

''Their architectural approach was different from what was going on in this country,'' she said. ''They were cutting blocks of glass as you would metal. Many were trained as sculptors.''

In the show here, the work of Ivo Rozsypal follows this tradition. There is a 30's look to his white and black sheets of glass, piled up like a deck of cards. One corner has been sliced off and moved slightly askew. The formalism of the composition is offset by marbleizing and slight imperfections in the red glass that encases some of the surfaces. ''It is probably re-used old glass,'' Mr. Sclar said.

In contrast, there is a lyrical tone to Gizela Sabokova's stack of glass blocks. Washes of color, applied to each clear layer before they were adhered to one another, impart the magic of transparent scrims in a stage set. From the front, they give an impression of depth and intermixed hues. In the side view, the illusion vanishes and one sees a series of aligned planes.

Jan Fisar's geometric forms play other optical games as the grouped dots and parallel lines seem to float in an inner space and undulate like flags as the viewer moves to different angles. This unexpected combination of precision, illusion and fantasy permeates most of the work here. However, frivolity and artifice, typical of so much of the American glass scene, are absent here. They are not missed.

In Frantisek Janak's piece entitled ''Good Advice,'' an old man seems to be haranguing his friend. The two heads have been arranged so that the open mouth of one is near the other's ear. If they were face to face, the dynamics would diminish into a boring argument. The surfaces of the two heads were left rough and unpolished, with grains of sand, residue from the molding process, still in the ears and other crevices.

A portrait of Marc Chagall is equally perceptive. Jari Harcuba cut the realistic details of the profile into a clear glass disk. Eye pouches are there and the bald head with a tuft of unkempt hair twisting upward. But who cares? There's a slight glimmer of a grin as Chagall contemplates the visions that only he could see.

Rene Roubicek must have chuckled as he created a visual pun. He blew molten glass into the forms of a full-sized flute and two clarinets. They look ready to play. All the authentic details are in place, the pads, the mouthpiece, but the instruments are clear glass touched with red and blue.

There is a also a delicious irony to the two ''cakes'' that Mr. Roubicek's wife, Miluse Roubickova, created, using a real bundt cake pan for her mold. Her fluted pastry, filled with an abundance of tutti-frutti-like chips of glass in a baker's dream of pastel hues, is set upon a ''doily'' to enhance the party mood. A few works convey a graver mood. As is the case in many countries, some of the artists may be in the vanguard of political ferment. There is an ambiguity to the raised hand by Jaromir Rybak. Is this a friendly greeting or the last gesture of a drowning man?

A strong sense of angst dominates Mrs. Sabokova's painting on glass, called ''The Black Figure.'' A torso is swathed in bandages with only the lips exposed. Is this Egyptian mummy coming apart, or is the artist expressing her feelings about the conditions of life in a troubled country?

The exhibition continues through June 17 at the Lee Sclar Gallery, 14 South Street in Morristown. The hours are 10 A.M. to 6 P.M. Monday, Tuesday and Thursday; 10 A.M. to 9 P.M. Wednesday and 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. Friday and Saturday."

Freudenheim, B. "CRAFTS; Glass Art by Czechs On Display." June 4, 1989. The New York Times. accessed September 8, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/04/nyregion/crafts-glass-art-by-czechs-on-display.html

Larry Hamill Photos from BIGG @ OSU artspace

Larry Hamill has posted photos of the 2009 juried BIGG show. http://larryhamillphotography.wordpress.com

2009
Larry Hamill:

"BIGG – Breakthrough Ideas in Global Glass - is currently on display at the OSU Urban Arts Space and Hawk Galleries. A collaboration between The Ohio State University’s Dept. of Art Glass Program, OSU Urban Arts Space and Hawk Galleries, the exhibit showcases 43 international artists.

A total of 97 pieces of glass artwork were selected following a juried review of over 650 artists’ submits. The international jury panel included Italian
glass artisan, Lino Tagliapietra; the Corning Museum’s Curator of Modern Glass, Tina Oldknow and Director of Hawk Galleries, Tom Hawk.

Over the years, William Morris, Dale Chihuly, Christopher Ries and Lino Tagliapietra, among others, have led the glass art movement. Sponsored by Steuben Glass, this exhibition was designed to advance new and innovative glass art worldwide. “We were looking for the next talent in glass art,” said Kelly Kaser, Deputy Director of the OSU Urban Arts Space.

Photo credit: Larry Hamill Photography

[...] Hiromi Takizawa’s piece entitled, Crossing the Pacific Ocean, combines a neon airplane suspended above an arrangement of glass bowls, creating a reflection in bubbles that seem to float across the ocean’s surface."

Hamill, L. "BIGG glass art breaks new ground." August 12, 2009. Larry Hamill Photography blog @ Wordpress. accessed September 8, 2009. http://larryhamillphotography.wordpress.com/2009/08/12/bigg-glass-art-breaks-new-ground/.

Telegraph Article on Art Collecting

2009 Francesca Gavin:

"At the opening night of a recent exhibition by upcoming UK artist Charming Baker, there was – among the typical art crowd, made up of fashionable types and city investors – a distinctly new, laid-back set of collectors enjoying the art, drinks and live DJ.

It was more like a party than a private view. “I’ve sold work to lawyers, city guys and creative directors,” says the artist, “but now I'm also selling to students and housewives.”

Baker, who has just secured the backing of an American artist-management company, believes that the art world is changing. “It feels less elitist,” he explains. “People are buying what they like, not what they are told to like.”

An increasingly savvy British public is adjusting its relationship with the new art world, with more people finding the confidence to buy. And while some seek the pleasure of looking and owning, others see it as a form of investment.

Three years ago, for instance, Baker’s paintings were selling for £600 – they now fetch up to £9,000. The popularity of his work is also being boosted by the fact that everyone can now access it via the internet. So, rather than having to step into daunting galleries, potential collectors can log on to view art in their own homes.

Another artist who spotted the democratic, and commercial, potential of the internet was Banksy, a street artist. His canvases, that originally cost £400 online, have gone on to sell for up to £60,000 at auction.

A lot of the initial interest in buying a Banksy, however, was generated by enthusiasm for his prints – which, traditionally, are sold at more democratic prices than original works.

Steve Lazarides, who co-founded the online gallery POW (Pictures On Walls) with Banksy, first specialised in selling limited-edition prints. “You could start off paying as little as £50 a print,” says Lazarides, “so they provide the perfect entry-level to start collecting.”

Lazarides is viewed as one of the major sellers in this field, and his eponymous galleries in London and Newcastle deal in both prints and original works. He now sells a broad range of art to an increasingly broad range of clients.

For those who like the idea of buying well-known names, contemporary galleries - such as the White Cube, The Serpentine, the ICA and 176 Gallery in London; Ikon in Birmingham; Baltic in Gateshead; and all of the Tate galleries - produce very impressive limited-edition pieces to accompany shows.

Smaller establishments, such as The Modern Institute in Glasgow (which has spawned a few Turner Prize winners) also offer artist editions.

When Damien Hirst first released editioned prints of his famous spot paintings a few years back, the price tag was a very affordable £500. Those same prints are now changing hands for more than £10,000.

To collectors it is an increasingly acceptable way to own and invest in art.

“We were getting a huge range of people coming in to see shows, and quite a few of them asked if there were affordable pieces available,” says Sam Chatterton Dixon at the contemporary London gallery Haunch Of Venison.

Producing limited-edition prints by artists was a way for the gallery to respond. “There is a sense, with those interested in collecting, that if they start with prints then, over time, they might move up to buying more expensive items.”

The always experimental and interesting Zoo Art Fair, now simply called Zoo, is devoting an entire section of its October event to accessibly priced artworks. Art fairs such as Zoo and the Glasgow Art Fair are like supermarkets for contemporary art, and present a comfortable environment in which to begin looking.

“They are a really easy way for someone to see an awful lot of work under one roof,” says Jonathan Burton, director of the London Art Fair (LAF). “There is a huge range of price points.” Indeed, at this year’s LAF you could pick up anything from a £200 print to a £3-million painting.

On a smaller scale, London galleries like Crisp (which also has a space in Los Angeles) and Ancient & Modern, and Edinburgh gallery The Fruitmarket, all exhibit upcoming names.

Upcoming names worth grabbing now include the text and multimedia works by Charlie Woolley at David Risley Gallery; Sam Griffin, who produces intensely worked drawings and who shows with Schirman & de Beaucé in Paris; and Bouke de Vries, whose delicate sculptures are available online from the web-based MurmurART.

In fact, this online space specialises in promoting artists in the difficult stage between graduating and getting a gallery. The result is an ever-changing number of interesting, wellcurated artists selling from £90.

“Buying art requires you to not just look inside the painting,” notes MurmurART’s Donald Eastwood, “but also inside your soul.""

Gavin, F. "Start something special: contemporary art collection." August 27, 2009. The Telegraph, UK. Accessed September 8, 2009. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sponsored/thefriday/6081342/Start-something-special-contemporary-art-collection---The-Friday.html

Friday, September 4, 2009

1941

In this time line I pull quotes to illustrate a thread in popular and scholarly writing and criticism about glass. Here we will see current glass artists defending their art against the accusations and separating themselves from these stereotypes and, hopefully, find out how and where the now-common opinion was born. Fundamentally, the general thesis seems to be born of the question, What Is Art? This question I will leave to others to answer, here I am only documenting the written history of a popular way of thinking and a popular taste.

1941 Darrel A. Diehn:
"Glass, one of man's oldest known materials, steeped in centuries of romance, violence and thundering drama, today is one of man's most useful products, and, despite its antiquity, is in many ways as new as tomorrow's newspaper. This magic material, its remarkable characteristics unmatched by any substance known to civilization, was discovered long before the time of Christ.

Its exact "birth" is a subject of scientific difference of opinion, but popular tradition, based on the writings of Pliny, Italian historian, dates it back to a day 5000 years ago when a party of Phoenician sailors debarked to prepare their noon-day meal on a sandy beach of the Mediterranean sea.

There being no rocks on the barren shore to construct a fireplace, the sailors brought cakes of nitrate (sodium nitrate) from their ships, and when the embers of the fire had died down, the sailors beheld a strange new material, a glittering transparent mass never before seen by man, a crude form of glass formed by the fusing of the cakes of nitrate and beach sand.

Modern glass men, well knowing that it requires a fierce heat of great furnaces generating temperatures of 2600-2850 degrees Fahrenheit to properly liquify sand, soda ash and lime (three of the most important ingredients of glass) are inclined to scoff, but the discovery is credited with being something more than a Phoenician fantasy.

The sailors examined the shimmering material with vast interest, but with no more than that displayed by a group of motion picture news weekly men quite recently when a three ton elephant stepped upon a platform with a floor consisting only of a one-half

inch pane of glass. The glass bent but did not break under its terrific live weight load and returned to its normal plane when the huge pachyderm stepped off.

Before discussing the fascinating modern magic of the glass technicians, however, it is well to consider a few things that developed after the discovery of glass, so that we may better understand the gigantic drama of American glass manufacture.

Although the production of glass as we know it today involves tremendous expenditures annually and a processing that has been reduced to an exact science, amazing in its detail, it can be said that fundamentally glass is the result of the fusing of sand, soda ash, lime and certain other ingredients.

Despite this apparent simplicity there is magic in its making, yet no black magic or mystery that characterized the art for about 5000 years, when even murder was invoked to protect the secret of manufacture.

Glass making then was conducted only by master craftsmen who worked behind locked doors, protected by secret guilds whose members were punished by death and their families thrown into prison for any slight attempt to divulge secrets of the craft.

From its accidental discovery by the Phoenicians, glass and its manufacture gradually spread among the Mediterranean peoples, Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans. To this day some of the most beautiful objects to be found in our museums are examples of ancient Egyptian bottles, vials, decanters in blue whose exquisite quality baffles the modern colorist to duplicate.

Glass manufacture reached its pre-American apexin the Middle-Ages when haughty Venice was at the height of its glory, its marvelous glass products the envy of European royalty.

On the tiny island of Murano, nestling among Venetian lagoons, furnaces were fired behind barred

doors. Murano's glass workshops were prisons for the men who knew the secrets of blowing molten glass into shapes of gleaming beauty that were making Venice famed throughout the courts of Europe.

The outside world knew nothing of the operations, for a very good reason. Fortnightly the dreaded council of ten met in a palace room overlooking the island of Murano.

There the council members discussed the latest attempts to steal the secrets of the Venetian art of glass making. King Louis of France, was offering fabulous riches, titles of nobility, to any man who would escape from Murano and establish glass making in France.

The famed council acted quickly, swift death overtaking more than one hapless glass blower who tried to reach France; a few of them were stabbed almost within the shadows of the gates of Paris by trusted servants of the relentless council.

Despite all the murderous precautions, however, the secrets finally passed beyond the shores of Murano, into France, thence to Germany, England, and throughout Europe, yet withal the art remained a secret, handed down from one glass blowing family to another.

In 1607, eight Polish and German glass blowers, members of Captain John Smith's first colonizing

group, sent out by English merchants, landed in the James River at what was later to be the site of Jamestown, Virginia. They constructed a crude glass furnace in the nearby woods; thus the manufacture of glass was the first industrial enterprise on American soil.

It failed, as did the works established later by Stiegel, the first great American glass maker, whose work today brings huge prices from museums and collectors.

Glass plants of early America struggled on and upward, failing here, rebuilding there, but always the industry grew.

In 1900 the making of glass was not essentially different from what it had been in 1800 or 1700 or

1600—and at the turn of the century, when American business was about to launch one of the world's greatest industrial progressive parades in transportation and machinery, glass was still marking time.

Then there came, elbowing his way out of the hills of West Virginia, an aggressive young Irishman, himself a master glass blower, son of a coal miner, to precipitate the world's most interesting struggle between men and machines.

His invention of the world's first automatic bottle making machine in 1903 did more in fifteen years to revolutionize the art of glass making than anything had done for thousands of years previously. As one views window glass coming out of one of our large glass factories, it is a little difficult to realize that this automatic progression is so new. Its birthday can be fixed to an exact date in 1916. To comprehend the revolutionary character of the flat-drawing process requires a description of the older processes.

Window glass was obtained by blowing glass into spherical shapes, reheating, and rotating until it became a disk of glass marred by a bull's-eye in the center. America's center of production was Boston and "Boston Crown Glass" became a trade name in colonial America. After annealing, the disks were cut into small panes, those with the bull's-eye being used chiefly for transoms and door side lights.

Larger panes resulted from another hand process involving exhausting physical labor and high skill; it came into general use early in the nineteenth century and continued to be the accepted method until 1903. By repeated gatherings, blowings and swingings of molten glass at the end of a heavy iron blowpipe, long cylinders were obtained up to dimensions of twenty

inches in diameter and seventy inches in length. They were then cut, reheated and flattened; but the most skillful operatives could not bring to absolute flatness glass originally blown into cylinders. For this reasonold window glass is slightly bowed and given a con-

siderable degree of distortion. Size and quality were limited sharply by human capacities under tremendous strain, and progress awaited a mechanical method for eliminating lung power and muscular fatique.

The first step in that direction substituted com-pressed air in the blowpipe for the lung power of the glass blower. This made possible the fashioning of the large cylinders and sheets at less cost; but flattening the glass continued the same defect. In the making of modern sheet glass preliminary operations are similar to those in other forms of glass manufacture, but they proceed on so vast a scale in those great plants that a visitor may be puzzled in cor-relating the simple "shop" glass making of olden days with the vast automatic manufacturing program.

From railway cars the raw materials are run up by cup elevators into huge circular concrete bins, like farm silos, but much larger. From these the ingredients of the "batch" are drawn by gravity—so much silica, so much ground limestone, so much soda ash and saltcake. They are the chief ingredients which from time immortal have been used in glass making, but real progress has been made in controlling the mixture in both purity of materials, exactness in proportions and thoroughness in mixing. After these materials have been thoroughly mixed in a power hopper, the batch travels along a broad band to the furnaces on a conveyor system. Unloading is accomplished at any desired furnace. There, with a certain amount of cullet, or broken glass, it is fed into furnaces to be melted under a heat of approximately 2700 degrees Fahrenheit. Cullet melting more quickly than the new materials, starts the liquefying of the mass and protects the sides of the tank from chemical action during the early stages. Even so, the tanks must be frequently rebuilt.

Eyes shielded against heat and glare, the visitor peers through an observation hole into a tank of

molten glass. What he beholds is a lake of glass five feet deep and more than a hundred feet long, but the optical effect is one of vast distances and weird un- canny vistas. The colors of this lovely, ever-changing mirage are those not often seen on land or sea. Heat waves and convection currents explain the illusion of

distance and the diffusion of light, but the layman will rest content with an unforgettable revelation of beauty. This lake of glass in the great tank is ever being replenished at one end, and at the other end giving forth a broad carpet of white hot, even-flowing glass.

The endless carpet passes first through a chamber which cools the glass slightly by a short, sudden drop in temperature to toughen it in preparation for a straight upward pull to bending rollers, thence hori- zontally over flattening rollers, and into the lehr for slow annealing. The powdered batch and broken cullet have become fused into a solid transparent sheet; the white hot fluid of a few hours ago is now cool enough to be handled by cutters as it emerges from the lehr. The slow annealing possible under this flat-drawn process reduces internal strains and yields glass less brittle and hence more economically cut for glazing.

The past and the present of glass is strangely interwoven; one of the most fascinating stories of lost treasure ever told has to do with glass. A glass that was malleable, that would bend, that could be hammered like metal and dropped without breaking, was invented by one of the master craftsmen back in the days of the Caesars, when Liberius was master of the Roman world.

The inventor was brought to Caesar, the remarkable qualities of the glass demonstrated to him. He watched as the inventor flung the glass on the marble floor of the audience chamber, and as hammer blows were rained upon it. Here was one of the greatest discoveries of the ages, of untold value, the secret known to a single man, yet Caesar ordered him killed on the spot. He feared the marvelous glass would be worth more than gold and silver, and his own vast fortune was in those precious metals. Thus was lost on the bloody sword point of the Nubian slave body- guard a secret that kept the world waiting 2000 years to rediscover.

Today in one of the great glass plants of the country, technicians are working with the modern

counterpart of that Caesarian glass. It can be twisted to a remarkable degree and is highly resistant to im-pact and severe thermal shock; it is a glass that is making possible the manufacture of all glass furni-ture. It enables glass to be utilized for applications heretofore ideally suited to glass but restricted to other materials because of the physical limitations of ordinary glass.

It is known as Tuf-flex or tempered plate glass. It is produced by heating ordinary plate glass until it is almost plastic and then cooling it suddenly by sub-jecting both surfaces to jets of air. Both outer sur-faces, cooling more rapidly, are in a state of compression, while the inner portions of the glass are in tension or pressure in the opposite direction. In general one can say that with this discovery another ancient art has been accomplished.

Restricted in usage until comparatively recently, glass today is the symbol of all progress. It is the

ever-present servant of man, and it can be said that we of today are dependent upon glass in one form or another every hour of the day and night from the moment we are born until the day we leave this earth.

Diehn, D. "History of Glass." Ohio State Engineer. March, 1941. PDF file @ The Knowledge Bank at Ohio State University, accessed September 5, 2009. https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/1811/35776/1/OS_ENG_v24_i04_005.pdf. Google automatically generated the html file: http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:bhj06n7y_2cJ:https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/1811/35776/1/OS_ENG_v24_i04_005.pdf+dreaded+glassblower&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=usOhio State University's Knowledge Bank which operates with the Creative Commons license.

Photo of the Day

Work from Iceland's Sigrun Olof Einarsdottir


Photocredit: Sigrun Olof Einarsdottir
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/photo.php?pid=267886&id=627755829

Second Century now accepting new students!!

photocredit: ABJ Seattle Glass Online, 2009

Esther Clark and Bennett McKnight
are now holding bead making classes in their West Seattle shop,
Second Century!

photo credit Jeff Larsen, Seattle PI
http://www.seattlepi.com/getaways/112192_shorttrips13.shtml

Garth Clark on 'What is Craft'

2008 Garth Clark:

"Q: How do you define ‘craft’?

A: Craft is one of the visual arts and it is a visual art that focuses on a close and intimate relationship with materials and processes. In the simplest way, that’s really what it is. None of that definition means that it cannot be everything else, that when you work with materials you don’t bring your entire life’s biography into the work, that you have ideas that flow through it, but ultimately it is different from other fields in that it has a material and process intensity. That is also it’s problem. Because now as art is going multi-media, you can work with any material, change, shift, if there’s a store in town, a junk pile somewhere, you can drag something out of, you can migrate from one material to the other. Crafts is kind of a difficult issue for our culture today because it takes, depending upon the field, anything from seven to ten years to develop that extraordinary intimacy with materials. And the other thing which makes it different, I think, is, and this is probably a personal bias, but, craft is, to my mind, at best when it is dealing with sensuality. When it starts putting on all those little footnotes from art history, it tends to get a little more tiresome than when it just grabs you by the throat and just thrills you because of something that you see that is possibly completely abstract but has no narrative whatsoever. That’s the exciting thing that it does that, at least in today’s fine arts, you don’t experience as much."

Clark, G. "How Art Envy killed the crafts movement." Part two, Questions and Answers. Lecture at the Museum of Contemporary Crafts, Portland, OR. October 16, 2008. Transciption by ABJ Seattle Glass Online, September 5, 2009. Podcast found at: http://www.museumofcontemporarycraft.org/media/2008_10_16_Garth_Clark_CraftPerspect2.mp3

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Glassblowers, Lantern Makers, and Elephant Washers

2009 Jamie Rhein:

"With Labor Day approaching, as we think of work, consider the culturally significant jobs in the world that may not be around in the future. Here is a look at seven that are hallmarks of particular regions.

First up. Traditional Glass Blower. In one of the furnace rooms at Cam Fornace in Murano, Italy, a short water bus hop from Venice, is a black and white photo from the 1920s (or thereabouts). In the photo, young men are blowing glass the way that glass blowers in Murano have blown glass for hundreds of years.

One of the men in the photo is the father of the master glass blower in this shot that I snapped two weeks ago when he was demonstrating how to make a vase. This master glass blower has been working at Cam Fornace ever since he was 14-years-old when he started there as an apprentice. Now he is 62.

According to our tour guide at our factory visit, traditional glass blowers are becoming a dying breed. In the past, the art was passed on through generations as sons learned from their fathers. These days, Italian sons are not particularly interested in their fathers' glass blowing life. Our guide suspects that in twenty years, it will be hard to find a traditional Italian glass blower.

This doesn't mean there won't be glass blowers, but there won't be many--if any-- people who will be doing the art the way it's been done for centuries. Cam Fornace will not be the same.

Traditional glass blowers aren't the only jobs that are becoming a rarity. I've thought of others based on what I've seen in my travels. Each are jobs that are impacted by economics and cultural shifts. Here are six more jobs you may want to see people do before it's too late."

The other 6 include: Cyclo driver, Bybee Pottery maker, Horse carriage driver, Traditional lantern maker, Coconut Shell Rope Maker, and...Elephant Washer.

Rhein, J. "Seven jobs that may soon disappear." September 1, 2009. Gadling blog. Accessed September 3, 2009. http://www.gadling.com/2009/09/01/seven-jobs-that-may-soon-disappear-travel-to-where-they-are-whi/

Colleen Anderson on the effect of the economy on local glassblowers

2009 Colleen Anderson:

"You might be wondering what art glass is. It’s any piece of glass that’s not utilitarian. Vases, stained glass, goblets, plates, paper weights and other items that are made by hand. They’re rarely mass-produced unless you’re looking at huge glass factories like Waterford crystal (you can see more about that factory in my Ireland blog pieces). There are two categories of art glass: cold and hot. Cold glass is taking pieces that already existed and making something of them, whether that is cutting and gluing them together, sandblasting them or using as part of other art pieces. Hot glass involves slumping, blowing, lampworking or otherwise molding molten glass using a furnace (or other heat source) and a kiln.

Blown glass is expensive for several reasons. A batch of glass without impurities must be kept molten at all times. This requires running a gas furnace 24/7 at a precise temperature. If the furnace has to be shut down, the glass has to be cooled and reheated slowly and can take up to two weeks to attain the right temperature. So it’s not feasible to shut off a furnace each night. Imagine your gas bill for heating your home and then multiply it to a temperature to keep glass molten (2400°F) and you might just fathom the cost. On top of that you need another heated furnace area for working the glass, called the glory hole, and at least one annealing kiln. Without cooling the formed glass gradually it will develop stresses and break.

Beyond the heating and maintenance of molten glass, there is the expense of a studio and the equipment. As well, every color in glass must be bought and added when blowing. These colors must also be pure and compatible with the basic clear glass in the crucible. Before even blowing the glass, the costs are huge.

Then comes the training. Glass blowing is not easy. It takes years of constant work to perfect the craft. One must be able to blow several glasses of the same size, with the same thickness (and not too thick or uneven) as well as even color if you’re making a set of something. You must be able to blow items round that should be round and oval if they’re oval. You have to maintain great skill in keeping openings even, patterns working, colors mixing. Anyone fresh out of college will still need years to perfect their craft.

And then you have to hope you can sell the pieces. Seattle has a fairly vibrant art glass community, courtesy of the Pilchuck Glass School. Some of those graduates are in BC and other areas, but Canada has a problem for supporting the arts. Our population is about 34 million, which is probably similar to the population of New York or California. When you take a percentage of people who support the arts or can afford to buy it, you get much fewer people, but the cost of producing the art is still the same. Canada is at a huge disadvantage. Yet, to market art can take as much time as making the art itself.

Thus, with our slumping economy, the arts have been nosediving. Vancouver used to have quite a few hot glass studios. The hardest to maintain were the glassblowing studios because of the costs. These included Andrighetti Studio, Joe Blow, David New-Small, Robert Held, Starfish Gallery in Victoria, Molten Spirit Glass Studio in Roberts Creek, and Solart Glass Studio in West Vancouver. Jo Ludwig in Victoria does slumped and fused glass, which negates the need for furnaces and glory holes, thus greatly reducing the cost. Joel Berman in Vancouver does architectural walls and windows. There are many other studios doing architectural glass whether molded or stained glass. A few do the kiln slumping. And fewer the glass blowing.

Joanne Andrighetti stopped blowing and running her studio due to exorbitant rent increases in a trendy area. She does lampworked glass now. Joe Blow, run by Jeff Burnette is the latest to fall into the embers of the tight economy. Both of these studios taught classes, besides renting space to other blowers. Starfish Gallery also closed a while back.

There may be a few other studios which I haven’t mentioned that are still going. Some have a prime location like the Granville Island studios that get a good chunk of tourist trade. Other studios do production line art glass and commissions for such places as Waterford crystal. But the places for one of a kind art glass are truly shrinking and it’s too bad. It’s too bad I don’t have the means to support these and other arts more. It’s too bad that Jeff has had to end a thirty-plus year career in blowing. I’ve heard similar tales from other artists in other forms of art.

Here’s an example of what some former glass artists are doing to make ends meet. G is slinging fish for pay and taking HD photos for fun, and M is selling sausage and painting. E is making cheese. The skill to make art takes as long as any other skill-set or doctorate. Without art we lose beauty, a resting place for the eye and mind to replenish itself and make it through the every day.

So, if you want a deal on art from two artists now struggling to make ends meet go to Joe Blow Glassworks as Jeff is selling off his glass pieces, and Eric Montgomery (a cold glass and artist) is having a sale on some of his pieces. You could end up with a unique piece of a dying or shrinking art form that has existed for thousands of years."

Anderson, C. "The Death of Art Glass." August 4, 2009. Colleen Anderson: Writing from both sides of the brain, blog. Accessed September 3, 2009. http://colleenanderson.wordpress.com/2009/08/04/the-death-of-art-glass/

Dan Joseph Friday and Terrance Guardipee @ Daybreak Star Gallery opens Oct. 22nd

2009 J.J. Stein:

"The Daybreak Star Gallery is proud to present an exciting collaborative exhibition entitled Layers: New Works by Terrance Guardipee and Dan Joseph Friday. The exhibition will open on October 22nd and will be on display until December 11th. Layers will feature two internationally acclaimed artists– painter Terrence Guardipee (Blackfeet) and glassblower Dan Joseph Friday (Lummi/Swinomish). These two artists will show recent works , juxtaposing their different mediums of painting/collage and blown glass in one gallery space, focusing on the interaction of Native American history with contemporary artistic expression .

Terrence Guardipee is known for collaging stylized figures painted above antique maps, receipts, checks, and used ledger paper from the late 19th Century. He has won numerous awards, most recently First Place and Best of Division at the 2008 and 2009 Santa Fe Indian Art Markets. His work is in the permanent collections of The Smithsonian National Museum of THE? American Indian, The Margaret Casey Foundation Art Collection, The Heard Museum, and The Museum of Natural History in Hanover Germany.

Dan Joseph Friday’s glass work is representative of two worlds: his Puget Sound upbringing and his formal training in traditional Italian glass blowing methods. Dan was raised in the locally and comes from a family of fisherman. He has worked with artists at the top of the glass world including Dale Chihuly, Paul Marino, and Pino Signoreto, and he has taught at the Pilchuck Glass School. He describes his work as “a local Native street kid’s interpretation of glass creation,” and he is interested in how viewers can see the reflection of his urban Native heritage in his work.

The exhibition is free at Daybreak Star. The exhibition opening on the evening of October 22nd will feature live music, complimentary nutritious snacks and a question and answer session with the artists.

This exhibition is funded by the Mayor’s Office of Arts and Cultural Affairs."

Stein, J.J. "Exhibition at Daybreak Star: New Works by Terrence Guardipee and Dan Joseph Friday." August 26, 2009. Native Seattle blog. Accessed September 3, 2009. http://nativeseattle.com/2009/08/26/exhibition-at-daybreak-star-new-works-by-terrance-guardipee-and-dan-joseph-friday/

File Under: Pilchuck 'discovered'

2009 Kristi Pihl:

"Pilchuck Glass School, started by glass artist Dale Chihuly in 1971, has an international reputation, and draws students and teachers from around the world.

The school is isolated, in the woods on private property northeast of Stanwood. The teachers, staff and students live on campus for three-week sessions, said Sara Ball, Pilchuck Glass School spokeswoman.

In addition to the summer sessions, Pilchuck Glass School has a resident artist program, where two non-glass artists live and work on campus during each summer session, Ball said. A team of craftsmen and women translate the artists' vision into glass.

The school also hosts emerging glass artists from September to November, she said.

It's hard to believe a chunky bit of glass can become an elaborate goblet.

However, that's exactly what glass artist Adam Smith, of Camano Island, did while attending the glass school for the last several weeks.

Smith had wanted to take a class at Pilchuck for a while. As a fifth-grade teacher at Utsalady Elementary, the summer off meant he had the time.

Smith started working with glass after taking lessons at Seattle Glassblowing Studio six years ago. After that, he taught himself, and created pieces at his home studio, Spinfire Glassworks.

Smith took "Cups with Cane," taught by Tom Rowney, an Australian glass artist. It is one of the most challenging things that someone can do with glass, he said.

To make a cup, Smith said he starts with a chunk of glass, and then elongates the heated glass into a long tube, called a cane, which is cut into smaller pieces. Some of those pieces become a cylinder, which Smith then blows into the goblet part of the cup.

First, Rowney explained the techniques, Smith said. Each day, he demonstrated them to the class for three hours.

Students started with the basic glass shape and ended with wine glasses.

Smith also got the chance to watch other classes, including "Fashioning Glass," offered by Preston Singletary, and "Fundamentals of Lampworking," by Roger Parramore.

Smith said he could walk into any of the many shops on campus and ask a question on how to do something, and have someone answer.

"There's no trade secrets," he said.

Some of the procedures take three people to successfully complete, Smith said. Everyone needs to know his or her part. For example, one person might make the stem, while another makes the goblet and the last makes the foot.

Smith said he learned techniques and skills that he wishes he had already known. Those techniques will apply to anything he does with glass in the future.

"My style's completely different now," he said.

He knows when he returns home, he will no longer be satisfied with his previous pieces.

"I can't say enough about the place," he said. "It's lifechanging." "

Pihl, K. "The modest celebrity." Stanwood/Camano News. August 18, 2009. Accessed September 3, 2009. http://www.scnews.com/news/2009/0818/front_page/002.html

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Martin Blank in Interior Design Magazine

2009 Meghan Edwards:

"Meditations on the transience of life take many artistic forms. But for sculptor Martin Blank, like novelist Marcel Proust, contemplation began with a cup of tea. "I was watching the steam rise and dissipate into the air, and it struck me that we're ephemeral beings," Blank recalls. "How do you make objects that reflect that?" His work as a gaffer at Dale Chihuly's studio had been a lot more colorful than ephemeral, and Blank didn't begin grappling with that question in earnest until a 2002 residency at the Museum of Glass in Tacoma, Washington. There, he spent a week translating the fluidity of water into a more permanent form by hand-sculpting glass heated to 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit in the museum's glory-hole furnace.

Years later, when the museum commissioned him to create a permanent installation for the reflecting pool on the main plaza out front, he conceived Fluent Steps over the course of three months of work at the on-site hot shop, a nearby warehouse, and later the hot shop at Martin Blank Studios. He divided his composition into four "regions." Forms that rise to 15 feet tall at one end are called Cascades. The shorter peaks of Echo flow across the pool's surface. Crystal Skin, cast from the trunk of a 30-foot-tall evergreen tree, is installed in horizontal segments. And the hundreds of short glass bits are Wisps.

The first step was to sculpt the pieces, all 745 of them. Then he fused each to a handblown connector and glued that to a stainless-steel plate. The plate, in turn, was welded to a steel stem ready to be screwed into an array of vertical steel poles that he and a team of 41 artisans, architects, and engineers bolted to steel armatures on the bottom of the pool. In the event of damage to any of the components, the modular construction allows them to be easily replaced. Not to worry, though. Blank had the sculpture tested to withstand winds up to 80 miles per hour.

THROUGHOUT SME: LIGHTING CONSULTANT. PETER A. OPSAHL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. MAREL FOOD SYSTEMS: METALWORK."

Edwards, M. "Water Ballet." August 1, 2009. Interior Design Magazine. accessed online September 2, 2009. http://www.interiordesign.net/article/ca6676376.html?q=martin+blank&

Yoichi Ohira Glass Cover


Yoichi Ohira is on the cover of the new Glass!!!

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Oregonian Article on Museum of Contemporary Craft

2009 D.K. Row:

"Imagine buying your dream house in a dream neighborhood after waiting many years. Imagine paying the mortgage but charging food, clothing, furniture and other bills and necessities.

Imagine, then, when luck and credit run out. Where do you go?

For many facing this nightmare, the next step means foreclosure.

But for one of the oldest arts institutions in Oregon, the 72-year-old Museum of Contemporary Craft, the next step was a takeover -- still a legal work in progress -- by the Pacific Northwest College of Art.

The Portland museum's collapse in January is a familiar tale of entrepreneurship turned parable of survival. Like speculators buying property with subprime loans, the unchained risks of the museum's then-executive director, David Cohen, were rooted in audacity. Cohen wanted to reinvent the museum, but he did it by ignoring nearly every fundamental principle that nonprofit experts follow. What's worse, the museum's board let it happen.

"This was a great idea," says Cohen, who stepped down as executive director in October and is looking for work. "It just wasn't a fundable idea. We took the chance that once we built something, people would come. Then we'd go out and raise the money to pay for it."

Former executive director David Cohen has been looking for work since he stepped down from his post late last year.
Slouching toward the Pearl

When Cohen took over in 2002, he felt that the drowsy crafts museum was on a course to fall off the art world map. So the 53-year-old native New Yorker, who once worked at the Portland Center for the Visual Arts, persuaded the board to transform the museum.

Back then, it was known as the Contemporary Crafts Museum & Gallery and had spent its life on Southwest Corbett Avenue, where it had crafted a loyal following. Steeped in the city's midcentury art history, the craft museum was really a neighborhood center that empowered a community of artisanal lovers. Yet its influence had become more illustrative. With about 12,000 visitors a year at most, it seemed a faint light from the dimming Modernist heyday.

"We were once a leader in the art community," Cohen says. "And we wanted to be a leader again."

The art world is constantly aspiring. Bigger is better, more is great. At the time, museums, including the Portland Art Museum, lived off chutzpah and mojo, expanding their campuses without worry of the hangover bills that would arrive later. Cohen envisioned a museum that could play the art game as seriously as anyone.

Opportunity arrived for the craft museum in 2005, when Portland developer Jim Winkler began to look for buyers to create an art hub on the North Park Blocks, in the DeSoto Building. The museum wanted to be its anchor tenant, occupying the most square footage of the five arts businesses.

Led by Cohen, the museum orchestrated a plan to move beyond its core following and modernize with an alluring space, aggressively contemporary programming and, they hoped, new patrons with deeper pockets. To make the brand fit the vision, the nonprofit also updated its name, to the Museum of Contemporary Craft.

To accomplish all of this, the museum staff raised about $7.1million in roughly two years, $2million from the sale of its Southwest Corbett space alone. Cohen was jubilant. Many, including some museum followers, had underestimated the museum's nerve and grit. And maybe they had misjudged the friendly, shaggy-haired director, too.


Balancing act

Nonprofits' capital campaigns are about stirring speeches, splashy parties and bold visions.

But when a campaign ends, a fussy grind replaces vision. Time to roll up the shirt-sleeves and pay the bills. Small steps replace big leaps. Longtime Portland arts consultant George Thorn says this transition demands organizational balance.

"Every organization has an equation," says Thorn, who has advised many local arts nonprofits. "On the one side is what the nonprofit is trying to do, like curatorial programming. On the other side is the human financial time and resources that are available to it."

The museum's personnel changes explain that imbalance. In spring 2007, for example, three of the museum's roughly 13 full-time staff equivalents were working to raise money. But a year later, only two-and-a-half of the 22 full-time staffers were raising money for a budget nearly twice as large the previous year. Personnel expenses dwarfed income.

That shift in focus and internal chemistry began soon after the museum opened its Pearl District doors in summer 2007. Cohen already was cutting corners around details he embraced during the capital campaign, details that protect an institution from financial and other vulnerabilities.

The museum staff, for example, was overworked -- "burnt to a crisp" Cohen says. So much so the museum didn't try to raise the $300,000 in cash reserves it wanted to have before opening -- a crucial lifeline for a museum without an endowment and a savings account of $22,400. Part of the capital was used to purchase and renovate its new home, part of it funded operations.

Exhausted staffers, including the development director, started to depart for other opportunities. Yet departing staff members weren't always replaced in a timely manner. The fundraising position went unfilled for several months, which eventually proved fatal.

There were also new budgets and administrative responsibilities to grasp, like financial reports. But Cohen rarely produced them regularly. He wasn't cavalier, Linda Mantel, board chairwoman from 2004 to 2008, says. He was overwhelmed, struggling to master a growing list of obligations.

For its part, the board didn't maintain the oversight it should have, Mantel says. It lost touch with the museum's daily activities and financial picture.

"We didn't get day-to-day or month-to-month information," she says. "No one was hiding anything. It just wasn't a priority."

Blinding ambitions

From the outside, the museum may have appeared transformed, but internally it struggled to balance ambitions and capacity. That might not have mattered so much if the museum didn't keep taking financial risks.

Nonprofit experts agree that institutions should phase in growth, like new programs, and stabilize operations, especially after a fundraising campaign. But Cohen favored daring trajectories and gambles.

"I am an unorthodox leader," he says. "I never do things by the book. I had been successful pretty much all the way through this by doing things differently. And after we revived this once-dead organization, I felt we were on a roll."

Last spring, 10 months after opening in the Pearl, Cohen persuaded the board to approve a $2.2million budget, nearly twice as much as the previous year.

Compared to other museum budgets, $2.2 million is modest. But given the craft museum's struggles, meager savings and a fundraising environment hinting at a recession, the vaulting budget size seems careless in retrospect, maybe even quixotic. According to Mantel, the museum already was drawing heavily from the equity on its building and had yet to consolidate a patron base to match its appetites.

Cohen speculated that future fundraising and pledges could pay off debt and that enhanced programs would enlarge the core audience and secure donors who might contribute not thousands, but tens of thousands and more.

The show that christened the museum's new space, for example, was "Craft in America," an expansive, traveling exhibit that cost $46,000, the most expensive project the museum had ever presented.

Other dynamic exhibits followed, including retrospectives of enduring Oregon craft masters such as Ken Shores and a show by glass artist Melissa Dyne, the sort of conceptual exercise that would have been unlikely before.

Most of these projects were received positively, but the museum didn't really have the money to fund all of them.

Still, former director Cohen and curator Namita Wiggers rationalize the efforts.

"I wanted us to be a leader the moment we opened our new doors," Cohen says.

Wiggers agrees. "How can you build a new audience if you don't show them what you can do first?"

Others once inside the museum now wonder.

"We moved and immediately became another institution," says Marc Moscato, the museum's marketing manager in 2008 and a casualty of its October layoffs. "Yeah, the programs and exhibits changed, and the shows were more contemporary. But the whole identity thing -- maybe it was rushed. We should have grown into it."

According to arts consultant Thorn, the museum's expanded programming should have been introduced only when it had achieved a proven revenue stream.

"The reason organizations have deficits is usually because they're overprojecting or underachieving or both."

Then-gallery director Kristin Shiga tends to items in the museum's gift shop in November 2007. The gift shop experienced dramatically increased foot traffic after the museum moved to the Pearl District, and its sales accounted for a good portion of the museum's income.

Takeover, anyone?

Indeed, the numbers lay out the story.

In summer 2005, the museum had roughly two full-time curatorial and education staffers. By spring 2008, curatorial and education staff generated the most expense, with more than six staffers. Meanwhile, the museum spent most of the year without a development director. And it still had little cash.

Late last summer, Cohen and the board finally grasped the peril. But it was too late. The recession had arrived. Fundraising had dried up. And the museum was paying its bills mostly through credit, running up a roughly $1.1million debt.

By late October, the staff and budget had to be stripped. Cohen stepped down and became an hourly consulting adviser on development. Interim director Glen Gilbert immediately began to seek the most logical fallback: a takeover.

The museum approached three institutions, including the Oregon College of Art & Craft, but PNCA moved most aggressively and swiftly, Gilbert says. "We were not in a position to be too choosy."

Gilbert estimates the museum would have used up its $1.4million in credit by early February, and takeovers often take weeks, possibly months, to complete. Since January, PNCA has yet to chip in money; the museum is instead using its remaining credit to pay for daily operations.

Indeed, PNCA originally said legal possession of the museum's facilities, debts, assets, roughly 1,000-piece art collection and 12 staffers would be finished by mid-February. Now, it's April.
PNCA's situation

Another shift is the crafts museum's just-announced fundraising effort to relieve part or all of its debt before PNCA inherits it. PNCA and museum officials would not release definitive terms of the takeover agreement, but they say the new fundraising was the museum's idea and not a prerequisite for the takeover. The museum doesn't have to raise a target or minimum amount, either.

Still, it's a curious strategy reminiscent of what got the museum in trouble: Using credit while trying to raise money in a hostile fundraising environment. Last October, the museum even made a last-ditch plea. Few patrons answered.

Meanwhile, the community will get a chance to express opinions in a series of PNCA forums in March and April. But already, the college has tried to quiet anxiety and the perception that it is a Machiavellian empire builder. It says it has long-term intentions and promises to honorably steward the museum's art collection. It also promises that craft will be central to its programming, even though PNCA has plans for major design initiatives.

Despite assurances, there's skepticism in an art community that's suffered several blows, including the loss of art galleries and an art fair. Six years ago, PNCA's financial and administrative problems could have led to the loss of its accreditation. Is it now financially and institutionally resilient enough to revive a museum in addition to its other projects?

After all, PNCA has its own expanding list of challenges that resemble the museum's: capital renovations, swelling programs and pacifying an overworked staff and faculty.

Although it's raised about $28 million in pledges and donations for a $32 million campaign, PNCA has limited cash, President Tom Manley says. Manley wouldn't release balance sheets or savings data and wouldn't clarify whether PNCA can cover all of the museum's debt.

Which further casts PNCA's strategy for the takeover as a kind of speculative bet. PNCA hopes to cover the museum's roughly $1million budget through the museum's retail sales gallery, fundraising efforts and by streamlining operations.
Bittersweet lessons
Gilbert, the interim director who left the museum at the end of February, says his experience has resulted in a tipsheet for every nonprofit.

"Even in the best of times, you don't spend money you don't have," he says. Also, boards should provide oversight and nonprofits should grow incrementally to mind operations. They should never stop raising money, either.

The museum, he says, ignored every one of these rules because it was blinded by "the headiness of a vision."

Cohen still believes in that heady vision.

"In order for this whole thing to have happened right, I needed a perfect storm of positive events to happen," he says. "Instead, what happened to us was the perfect storm of negative events.""

Row, D.K. "How one of Oregon's oldest arts organizations tanked." The Oregonian. February 28, 2009. Accessed September 1, 2009. http://www.oregonlive.com/O/index.ssf/2009/02/how_one_of_oregons_oldest_arts.html

See Also: Glass Quarterly Hot Sheet: http://blog.glassquarterly.com/2009/08/21/after-audacious-expansion-falters-portlands-museum-of-contemporary-craft-merges-with-local-visual-arts-college-for-survival/#more-674

Glass Quarterly on Portland's Museum of Contemporary Craft

2009 Glass Quarterly Hot Sheet Blog:

"This week, the Pacific Northwest College of Art has made official its “merger” with the Museum of Contemporary Craft, one of Oregon’s oldest cultural institutions, with the announcement of a joint operations agreement leading to “a formal integration.” Overextended, and with its finances in dire shape, the Museum of Contemporary Craft will continue on with its permanent collection no longer in peril and its crushing debt burden taken on by the college. How the mission of the institution, known for decades as the Contemporary Crafts Museum & Gallery before a 2007 re-branding , may change now that is has been taken on by an educational institution with a heavy emphasis on design, remains to be seen.

The story of the disastrous expansion of a long-running crafts institution is a cautionary tale for any nonprofit seeking to reinvent itself. In an excellent analysis Oregonian newspaper’s arts reporter D.K. Row chronicled the sad tale of the Museum of Contemporary Craft’s former executive director David Cohen and his bold plans to turn a 73-year-old sleepy arts organization into a cutting-edge craft, design, and contemporary art institution with a shiny new building in Portland’s Pearl arts district. Row lays the blame for the museum’s many missteps in the board’s embrace of a highly speculative vision, and its agreement to proceed with an expansion without sufficient funding or a large enough endowment. When the economy went sour in 2008, the museum was unable to meet any of its optimistic projections and its financial position steadily deteriorated.

In a joint press release, the two institutions are presenting the new partnership as a cooperation between two independent institutions: “PNCA and MoCC will continue as stand-alone 501(c)3 entities, retaining their respective assets and liabilities for the duration of the Joint Operations Agreement to allow further time for the two institutions to knit together coordinated programming, communications, finance and fund-raising efforts.”

In the release, Kathy Abraham, board president of MoCC, characterized the negotiations up to this point as “a journey of discovery and reflection,” emphasizing the importance of “a sustainable future for the museum.”

Responding to emailed questions from GLASS, museum spokesperson Rebecca Burrell said there “aren’t any major changes in the works” as a result of the merger. Namita Gupta Wiggers will stay on as the museum’s curator, and will continue to pursue her vision for the museum , which has included more conceptual projects in glass such as Portland artist Melissa Dyne’s 2008 installation of an industrially produced window supported in such a way that it bent under the stress of gravity. Later this fall, a collaborative exhibit featuring glass instruments will open when Andy Paiko and Ethan Rose debut the project they have spent the summer working on. That event remains on the museum’s calendar for a November 19th opening.

As Burrell puts it: “This is an ever-evolving process, so the nature of this collaboration will reveal itself in quite a few stages.”

Stay tuned as the story continues to develop."

Glass Quarterly Hot Sheet Blog. Edited by Andrew Page. "After audacious expansion falters, Portland's Museum of Contemporary Craft merges with local arts college for survival." Posted August 21, 2009. Accessed September 1, 2009. http://blog.glassquarterly.com/2009/08/21/after-audacious-expansion-falters-portlands-museum-of-contemporary-craft-merges-with-local-visual-arts-college-for-survival/#more-674