Showing posts with label Niyoko Ikuta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Niyoko Ikuta. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

1992 part two

In this time line I pull quotes to illustrate a thread in popular and scholarly writing and criticism about glass. Here we will see current glass artists defending their art against the accusations and separating themselves from these stereotypes and, hopefully, find out how and where the now-common opinion was born. Fundamentally, the general thesis seems to be born of the question, What Is Art? This question I will leave to others to answer, here I am only documenting the written history of a popular way of thinking and a popular taste.

1992 Betty Freudenheim:

"
SPOTLIGHTS penetrate the translucent interiors and set off sparklike reflections on the surfaces of the art glass on display at the New Jersey Center for Visual Arts. "Contemporary Glass Sculpture: Innovative Form and Expression" is one of the most stunning craft exhibitions in this state in recent years.

Pat Kettenring, a curator of the show, said she had tried to include a broad range of glass techniques. The work shown demonstrates not only the intrinsic appeal of glass but also its value as a medium for expressing ideas. Ms. Kettenring and Kiku Fukui, the other curator, selected 42 pieces by nine American, three Japanese, one Swedish and two Czech artists.

Among them is Harvey Littleton. This year marks the 30th anniversary of his creation of a glass-blowing workshop on the grounds of the Toledo Museum of Art in Ohio. The success of this workshop proved his theory that glass blowing does not require the superheated furnaces of mass production factories, that glass can be a medium for artists to explore in their own studios.

It was the start of the American glass movement. Alumni of the Toledo workshop and Mr. Littleton's follow-up courses at the University of Wisconsin initiated similar glassmaking programs on campuses across the country.

Mr. Littleton creates his distinctive ribbons of striated glass by rotating a rod with a ball of molten glass in the glowing furnace. When the rod is removed, it is swung like a pendulum until the sphere gradually lengthens into an oblong.

"Blue-Ruby Spray" looks as though Mr. Littleton stretched, pulled and twisted his molten glass into looping curves on a carnival taffy-making machine. The segments were sliced and arranged into this flowing ensemble of sinuous lines and hues.

Dale Chihuly, a student in Mr. Littleton's postgraduate program at Wisconsin, continued his glass training in Venice. He was the first American to apprentice at the Venini glass factory on the island of Murano. He is also the founder of Pilchuck, a glass art colony on a hillside overlooking Puget Sound in Washington State.

Snakelike coils with black blossoms encircle a vivid vase in "Cadmium Orange Venetian #493." Mr. Chihuly has carried the excesses of Murano blown glass to new extremes of complexity, color and voluptuous curves.

What a contrast with the quiescent mood of Stephen Dale Edwards's "Silence." Four matte-black heads are partly buried in white sand, the artist's comment on the Persian Gulf war. Features of the fourth face are almost obliterated.

This artist works with glass cast in molds. His "Hunter's Dream" is a masklike image cast in optical glass. As light is diffused through the translucent interior, the solemn features take on an awesome authority.

William Morris's "Artifact Still Life" resembles a find from an archeological dig. This pile of pale blue bones, shells and vases of translucent glass may relate to the contents of the tomb of an ancient Phoenecian glassmaker. Flecks of gold settle like dust on the mottled surfaces.

Bertil Vallien's cast-glass forms also suggest the ruins of vanished civilizations. This Swedish artist sculptures elongated molds in wet sand and lays miniature treasures inside before filling them with molten glass. The oblongs are suspended as tall, motionless pendulums. Each one has the majestic power of a Nordic myth; clues to the stories are hidden within.

Mary Ann (Toots) Zynsky is an American glass artist who works in the Netherlands. The vivid splashes of color of her "Tierra del Fuego" seem to have been painted with a stiff brush with each bristle leaving its mark. The bowl was formed with thin threads of fused glass that resemble dried vermicelli. The outer edges have been manipulated to give the form a slighlty irregular contour. This piece has verve and panache.

There was no glass tradition in Japan when Kyohei Fujita started his career in a factory in the 50's, so he created one. Rather than emulating European glass blowers, he turned to historic lacquerware for inspiration. His elegant small boxes are blown glass layered with gold and platinum foil and flecks of color.

Niyoko Ikata cuts shapes from plate glass and laminates them together into neat stacks. These piles of glass take on the graduated contours of a sea-green shape with a transparent interior. While some artists use this technique to create pseudo vases, she extends her forms into undulating wings. Their spontaneity gives no indication of the slow, meticulous process required to form them.

One wall has 16 variations on a theme: glass bones and wood sticks wrapped with wire and bandages. Michael Aschenbrenner, a Vietnam veteran, said his work was "about healing, not destruction."

Nancy Mee complements the transparency and fragility of glass with rigid metals. Using a printmaking process, she transfers images of Greek goddesses onto plate glass and then bolts them to rusted steel plates. In "Veiled Goddess," a photograph of a skull X-ray is superimposed on the sculptured head, transfiguring its beauty. Her work becomes a metaphor for the relationship between the surface and inner beauty of women in a hard world.

The show runs through April 18. The New Jersey Center for Visual Arts is at 68 Elm Street. Hours are noon to 4 P.M. Monday through Friday and 2 to 4 P.M. Saturday and Sunday. Admission is free. A video shows the varied glassmaking techniques used by these artists.

Today at 3 P.M., William Warmus, a glass scholar, and Mr. Aschenbrenner, one of the exhibitors, will speak on "New Boundaries for Glass Art.""

Freudenheim, B. "CRAFTS; New reflections abound in glass art." The New York Times. March 15, 1992. accessed September 8, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/15/nyregion/crafts-new-reflections-abound-in-glass-art.html


1992 Chihuly:

"I instantly said, "Yes," when Speight Jenkins called to ask me to design Pelléas and Mélisande. Then I wondered what I had gotten myself into. I had never designed for the theater. One of the allures certainly was the opportunity to work on a grand scale. Over the years my architectural installations had increased in size and now I had the chance to go much bigger. Working on this scale with the extraordinary lighting instruments available in the theater was irresistible.

Speight came over to my studio to read the libretto out loud, while we played the CD. When he finished, I was deep in the land of Allemonde and eager to tackle the opera's brutal, murky, erotic power. But first I had to unravel the mystery of Mélisande. Where did she come from? She marries Golaud, but why? She immediately captivates Golaud's little brother Pelléas, but does she love him? Did she lie to Golaud because she was frightened or was she just pathological? Is Mélisande a victim or a vixen? Was it Maeterlinck or Debussy or both who didn't want us to know?

The story allowed my imagination to go in many directions and the ambiguity of the opera gave me great freedom. I began to envision immense glass forms on a black glass stage. A giant glass flower - the garden. A red tube - Golaud's broken heart. A pile of yellow glass - Mélisande's hair that was "longer than she." I wanted to suggest the essence of each scene in a way that was far more visual, visceral, intuitive than conceptual.

I made drawings on black paper and then went into the hot shop where the glass blowers turned the images into sculptures. We made these objects to scale and placed them in maquettes of the stage. We then photographed them so we could study the options. Speight, Neil Peter Jampolis and Bob Schaub, the technical director, came to the Boathouse and together we spent two days making the decisions about which sets to realize. Naturally we didn't always agree. But as Speight told me in the beginning: "The opera is the most collaborative of all the arts."

—Chihuly"

Chihuly, D. "Artist's Statement" for Seattle Opera's "Pelleas et Melisande" 1993. Accessed November 5, 2009. http://www.chihuly.com/installations/pelleas/statement.html

1992 Speight Jenkins:

"As though it were a normal request of an opera director to a glass artist, in the summer of 1991, I called Dale Chihuly and said, "I would like you to design the sets for Debussy's Pelléas and Mélisande. I think your material and sensibilities are exactly right. Are you interested?" Chihuly said, "Yes. Why don't you come over and see me?" Armed with a CD of Pelléas and several books, I went.

At the Boathouse, Chihuly's studio on Lake Union, I was taken on a tour by the irrepressible artist and was dumbfounded. I had never in my life imagined that one could do with glass what he has done. By the time we wound our way up the spiral metal stairway in his living quarters, I was convinced that only Dale Chihuly could design our Pelléas.

I began to talk to him about the opera, to spin the story and to tell of Debussy and Maeterlinck. Then we listened to the Tower Scene, the end of the scene in the Abyss and the whole next scene. He was so fascinated that we went on to a bit of the hair-pulling scene and some of the final encounter of the lovers. That was enough. Chihuly was hooked.

My enthusiasm for Chihuly as set designer, despite his complete inexperience in the theater, came directly from my feelings about the drama and music of Pelléas and Mélisande. It had immediately flashed in my mind when Jim Bailey, the Opera's late marketing director, and I discussed producing Debussy's impressionistic opera that nothing would be better than glass for the sets.

Chihuly's preeminence in glass is a given; he has made Seattle an internationally known center for the glass arts. With this fame and his legendary inventiveness, I believed no one could better Pelléas and Mélisande. Chihuly could realize Debussy's own concept of an ideal opera: two associated dreams. No place, nor time.

Pelléas and Mélisande is a bit like an onion - peeling away one layer only reveals the multitude of layers underneath. During the course of his life, Debussy supplied reasons as to why. The composer believed that the dream-like atmosphere of Pelléas was far closer to real life than the romantic realism of the operas of his contemporaries. He said, "In Pelléas (the original play by Maurice Maeterlinck), there is evocative language whose sensitivity could be extended into music and the orchestral decor." He loved the symbolist quality of Maeterlinck and felt that he could create the complexity of real people with this text.

Through the years audience reaction to Pelléas has not equaled musicians' and critics' evaluation. The premiere at the Opéra-Comique in Paris on April 30, 1902, was moderately successful though the press was divided and certain conservative elements of the public were outraged. Vincent d'Indy, an important composer of the time, wrote probably the most perceptive review. He stated that the crux to understanding the opera was to "find in Pelléas not what one had come to look for, but what the composer had intended to put in it."

Even though the opera was given in Paris every season until the beginning of World War II and made its way to every major opera house in the world, its unrelieved subtlety has proved difficult for many in its audience. Pelléas and Mélisande is allusive, illusive and elusive. The text and music allude to countless unspoken ideas and feelings. We must intuit Mélisande's feelings from her words and what the music tells us she is thinking. The illusive quality of the work can also be seen in Mélisande: Does she love Pelléas or not? Finally the elusive point can be made in the reasons behind her lying. Why not tell Golaud that she lost the ring in the well?

In this opera the audience must know precisely what the characters are saying. They may not tell you what they are thinking or feeling, but one must know their words for the music and their actions to communicate their true feelings. Having loved Pelléas since my first exposure to it at the Metropolitan in 1960, I felt that part of the problem of making Pelléas accessible to the public could be corrected by supratitles.

I also believed that the dreamy sets, which have characterized most Pelléas productions of my lifetime, reinforce a surface reading of the music. They are, in short, too much of a good thing. The public sees a visual spectacle so close to what they are hearing that they become bored. It seemed to me that the very abstract qualities of glass combined with Chihuly's remarkable, indeed unique eye for color would give us what we wanted visually.

So we were going to do a glass Pelléas. What on earth did that mean? Pieces of glass on stage? Stagehands in terror lest a wrong move destroy an art object, not just a theatrical prop? Chihuly was concerned about how we could realize his sculptural visions. I explained that we had extraordinarily gifted people who could create virtually any design at the appropriate scale. Robert Schaub, Seattle Opera's technical director, would be responsible for recreating Chihuly's designs for the stage. Chihuly already knew that one of his former students, Margie Jervis, was our talented chief scenic painter. Chihuly wanted to know more about stage lighting so we rented Intiman Theater and then the high school auditorium at Shoreline to show him the possibilities.

Working with Chihuly at every step was the director, Neil Peter Jampolis, who has won Tonys and Emmys for a host of lighting and set designs. He has been acclaimed for a great many opera sets and with Fidelio in Seattle in 1991 has had a distinguished beginning as a director. Jampolis had seen Chihuly's one-man show at the Seattle Art Museum in the summer of 1992 and had loved Chihuly's idea for the opera's Forest Scene - a shiny, apparently transparent green plastic material shaped into columns.

When Chihuly and Jampolis met, they went over Chihuly's rough sketches and Jampolis explained his ideas for the show. Through their conversations it became clear that Chihuly's design should be abstract, capturing a moment of feeling or perhaps conveying the whole spirit of the scene in one visual creation that would be glass or glass-like. Like the music the sets should be evocative and symbolist, not literal or realistic. Jampolis believes that the crucial moment of mutual understanding came after a spaghetti dinner in the Boathouse when the two of them were washing the dishes. He was suddenly able to communicate clearly to Chihuly what his role should be: Rather than turn himself into a stage designer, Chihuly should look within his own artistic sensibility to find a visual equivalent for each of the scenes. The Opera's duty would be to execute those ideas. At the time of this writing, all the contracts are let and construction is moving forward. Now we can only hope that it will bring forth what we envision. On March 13th we hope that we will lead you to a magical Allemonde, a dramatic and aural experience worthy of Debussy and a visual experience worthy of that master of glass, Dale Chihuly.

—Speight Jenkins, Seattle Opera, 1992"

Jenkins, S. "Opera Director's Statement". 1992. http://www.chihuly.com/installations/pelleas/opera.html

Thursday, May 28, 2009

A game show for curators: Amgueddfa Cymru, come on down!

Photo Credit: Wahei Aoyama 青山和平, Toku Art Limited. http://toku-art.seesaa.net/

Photo Credit: from ArtDaily.org, taken by Mark Crick. http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=30881

From the Art Fund website:

"Art Fund Collect will take place on 14 May, the preview day of Collect, Europe’s leading contemporary crafts fair. Now in its sixth year, Collect will be presented over three floors of the Saatchi Gallery’s new space in London for the first time.

In a competitive challenge, shortlisted curators of public collections will have just one hour to choose an object for their museum or gallery’s permanent collection, ahead of private collectors. A panel of judges will examine their choices and decide who will win a share of the £75,000 prize from The Art Fund."

Unknown. "Ten curators in the running for a share in £75,000 prize for contemporary craft at Collect 2009." April 8, 2009. website accessed May 28, 2009. http://www.artfund.org/news/832

"Independent charity The Art Fund and the Crafts Council today announced the winners of Art Fund Collect, a £75,000 award for curators to acquire a piece of contemporary craft for their museum or gallery.

Art Fund Collect took place yesterday, 14 May, the preview day of the Crafts Council’s international fair Collect, held at London’s Saatchi Gallery.

The winners are: Aberdeen Art Gallery; Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales; Bilston Craft Gallery, Wolverhampton; mima, Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art and the V&A.

Aberdeen Art Gallery selected Neckpiece, 2009 by Umbria-based British jeweller Jacqueline Ryan for £26,550. Made from 18-carat gold, enamel and garnet, the piece displays the artist’s interest in natural formations.

Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales selected Red Stripe, 2008 by British glassmaker Rachael Woodman for £6,500. Dramatic in its use of colour, the work consists of eight glass tubes on a slate base.

Bilston Craft Gallery selected Propagation Project; Lichen Petals, 2009 by Japanese designer Junko Mori for £8,500. This highly dramatic, naturalistic work imitates the formation of lichen and is made from hand-forged steel.

mima, Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art selected Bracelet, 1999 by Italian goldsmith Giovanni Corvaja for £29,000.

The piece is made from 18 carat gold and 22 carat gold wire and juxtaposes intricate detail with bold geometric shapes.

The V&A selected Free Essence-6, 2009 by Japanese glassmaker Niyoko Ikuta for £5,700. This twisted, spiralling object consists of thin sheets of plate glass layered to trap the light.

In a nail-biting race around Collect, ten shortlisted curators from around the UK had just one hour to select a new object for their museum or gallery.

An expert panel then selected the winning curators, awarding them a share of £75,000 to acquire their object outright. mima wins for the second time this year.

Andrew Macdonald, Deputy Director of The Art Fund, said: "These five museums have each come away with a beautiful and inspiring object representing the very best in contemporary craft. Art Fund Collect is proving to be a wonderful way for curators to be bold and select outstanding works ahead of private buyers, for the public to enjoy."

Rosy Greenlees, Executive Director, Crafts Council, said: "I extend my congratulations to the winning museums and galleries. The Crafts Council aims to make the UK the best place to make, see and collect contemporary craft, and Art Fund Collect is central to achieving all these objectives, supporting makers, public collections and opportunities for visitors to see the very best craft."

Now in its second year, Art Fund Collect was set up in 2008 by The Art Fund, the UK’s leading independent art charity and the Crafts Council, the national development agency for contemporary craft, to encourage museums and galleries around the country to acquire the best in international contemporary craft. Due to the success of last year’s Art Fund Collect, The Art Fund increased the prize from £50,000 to £75,000 this year.

A total of 23 applications were received for Art Fund Collect in February 2009. The

final shortlist of ten was announced in April.

Now in its sixth year, Collect takes place from 15 – 17 May 2009 at the Saatchi Gallery, Duke of York's HQ, King's Road, London, SW3 4S"

Unknown. "Five UK museums win share of £75,000 prize for contemporary craft." May 15, 2009. website accessed May 28, 2009. http://www.artfund.org/news/archive/850

From Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales:

"Art Fund Collect took place yesterday, 14 May, the preview day of the Crafts Council's international fair Collect, held at London's Saatchi Gallery.

Andrew Renton, Head of Applied Art at Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales, was among ten curators to take part in a nail-biting race around the fair, with just one hour to select a new work for their museum or gallery.

An expert panel then selected the winning curators, awarding them a share of £75,000 to acquire their object outright.

Andrew Renton selected Red Stripe, 2008 by Rachael Woodman, for £6,500. The piece comprises eight coloured glass tubes on a slate base, brought alive with its dramatic use of colour. Rachael Woodman is an English glassmaker based in Bath. This work is the product of her collaboration with glassblower Stuart Hearn.

Andrew Renton said: "It's extremely encouraging for us that the Art Fund has recognised the National Museum's ambitions for its craft collections and enabled us to acquire a major new work. The Art Fund Collect scheme has done a wonderful job in boosting the confidence of curators of Britain's craft collections, and through this acquisition will now help the National Museum realise its potential to play a full part in the vibrant craft scene in Wales. Significant craft works like this by the best artists and makers will soon make an important contribution to the Museum's redeveloped galleries of modern and contemporary art.""

Unknown. "Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales wins share of £75,000 contemporary craft prize". May 15, 2009. website accessed May 28, 2009. http://www.museumwales.ac.uk/en/news/?article_id=519


Monday, April 13, 2009

1992

In this time line I pull quotes to illustrate a thread in popular and scholarly writing and criticism about glass. Here we will see current glass artists defending their art against the accusations and separating themselves from these stereotypes and, hopefully, find out how and where the now-common opinion was born. Fundamentally, the general thesis seems to be born of the question, What Is Art? This question I will leave to others to answer, here I am only documenting the written history of a popular way of thinking and a popular taste.
1992 Livio Seguso:

"Livio Seguso" Hakone Glass Forest-Ukai Museum, Japan; Venetian Glass Museum booklet, shown April 21-October 31, 2001, printed in Venice, Italy, April 2001.

1992 Marsha Miro:

“Glass is everywhere this month. Open the door to any of 23 galleries in the area, and there it will be, on pedestals, in display cases, on desks, ledges and tables. Another pink and turquoise vase. Another stained glass window of pretty colors. Another bowl that isn’t really a bowl, but a decorative trinket made out of bands of woven glass.

There is more glass on display in Michigan galleries this month than there is untainted whitefish in Lake Superior. But at least you can eat the whitefish; there is too much glass to do anything with.


In other words: Michigan Glass Month has gotten out of hand. It’s become a month where the great and good can be lost amid the mediocre. And anything is called “art.”
But don’t despair. Even though you will see a lot of works overly affected by fads—this year they include postmodern colors, picture-like forms and too many elements—you can still find much to please the eye. This year, Michigan Glass Month brings a range of different places, periods and artists that make the viewing situation unparalleled.
And it all began 20 years ago at Habatat Galleries in Farmington Hills.
Habatat’s International Glass Invitational demonstrates the foresight of co-owners Ferdinand Hampson and his sister, Linda Boone, who have more than proven their understanding of what glass art was, is and could be.

This year’s International includes mini-shows of the work of some 55 artists…

Early on, Howard Ben Tre…proved that tall architectural elements, like columns, could capture glass’ history and explore its properties, and still be provocative art.

Dan Dailey…and Ricky Bernstein married pop art ideas to glass.

The appeal of Dale Chihuly’s art goes beyond the glass audience, touching those who know about culture, painting, and other art forms. With his prolific output and his corner on beautiful natural forms and colors, Chihuly makes far more than the expected pretty glass.”


“Sea of Glass: works of art can still be found amid the galleries’ glitter glut”
4/3/92 by Marsha Miro. Publication Unknown. Found at http:www.habatat.com/article_detail.asp?id=4
Accessed April 14, 2009.


1992 Jon Krakauer:

"Born in fire, his fragile forms are in demand by museums and collectors-and the founder of the Pilchuck School i's just getting warmed up

From the street, the studio known as the Boathouse doesn't look like much. A sprawling waterfront structure sheathed in corrugated metal, its outward appearance suggests a welding shop or perhaps an abandoned cannery. But the building's humble exterior, dripping forlornly in the Seattle rain, is mere camouflage. In fact the Boathouse shelters a rollicking, hyperkinetic hive of art in the making, a scene so charged with heat and noise and unbridled energy that it makes the average MTV video clip look soporific by comparison.

The heart and soul of the studio is a high-ceilinged inferno called the hot shop. Along the perimeter of the 30-by-65-foot room, white-hot flames lick from the open doors of a half-dozen blast furnaces and a like number of propane torches. The roar from all that fire, though considerable, is nearly drowned out by the rap music pulsing from a bank of massive loudspeakers. A swarm of young people dressed in regulation artist garb-faded jeans, funky berets, T-shirts, sunglasses-rock and shimmy to the tune's insistent throb as they tend the furnaces and swing long steel pipes, at the end of which hang dripping gathers of molten glass.

Presiding over the action is a thick, stubby barrel of a man with fleshy features, a natty black eye patch and an unruly thatch of frizzy brown curls. Behold Dale Chihuly, one of only three American artists ever to have held a solo show at the Louvre. His stock- in-trade is blown glass-big, flamboyant, astonishingly sensuous works. Hailed far and wide as a virtuoso, perhaps the greatest glass artist of the 20th century, he also happens to be endowed with a Warholesque genius for self-promotion, and an accelerator that always seems to be jammed to the floor. In the words of Seattle arts writer Bruce Barcott, Chihuly "plays a song of himself at a breathless pace."

Chihuly, perhaps more than any other individual, has given blown glass the respectability of fine art. As recently as the mid- 1970s there was n-0 market to speak of for contemporary art glass in this country. Today Chihuly's pieces command as much as $60,000 each, with multipiece works selling for six-figure sums; and his creations reside in New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Smithsonian's Renwick Gallery and some 80 other museums here and abroad.

Among Chihuly's various quirks, perhaps the quirkiest is that the master glassblower has only rarely blown any glass himself since 1976, when an automobile accident robbed him of sight in his left eye. The ensuing loss of depth perception made it all but impossible for him to safely manipulate the five-foot-long blow-pipe and other arcane tools of his trade. Chihuly had been collaborating with other glass artists for some time to produce his elaborate designs. After the accident, undaunted, he simply trained a cadre of apprentices to shape the glass to his specifications. He continually fine-tunes this approach. The team that presently toils in the hot shop-numbering 14 on this particular morning-gives form to the artist's vision with the efficiency of a well-oiled machine. "We're like an orchestra," explains one of Chihuly's gaffers, or head glassblowers. "Dale doesn't play an instrument, but he's the guy up front with the baton."

The symphony begins with Chihuly standing at a cluttered drafting table, chin in hand, lost in thought as his assistants scurry to and fro preparing a batch of glass. The contemplative lull is over in a matter of seconds. He grabs a stick of charcoal and abruptly puts line to paper in bold, slashing strokes as ideas bubble to the surface of his consciousness like trout rising to a hatch of mayflies. Exchanging charcoal for a paintbrush, he then daubs on a wash of color that might be concocted from ink, watercolors, wine, coffee dregs, or a glass of bitters and soda water-any tinted liquid within reach is fair game. Two minutes after starting the sketch, Chihuly's wool slacks are spattered with paint, and the blueprint for the first piece is completed: a rough-edged rendering of a sleek, voluptuous cylinder wrapped in vinelike tendrils.

After tossing the sketch onto the concrete floor to dry-a somewhat irreverent way to treat a painting that will itself have a price tag of $3,000-Chihuly starts another one, completes it just as quickly and then dashes off renderings of two more pieces. When the color can be trusted not to run, an assistant affixes the paintings to a nearby blast furnace with refrigerator magnets, where the team can consult them as they work.

Transforming these flat sketches into three-dimensional pieces of glass is a trickier, more labor-intensive task, imbued with a degree of drama seldom associated with the making of art. If nothing else, a Chihuly blow is usually pretty good theater. Today, a tall, loose-limbed former student of Chihuly's, Richard Royal, is acting as guest gaffer. To start the process, Royal sticks a blowpipe into a furnace containing a pool of clear glass heated to 2,500 degrees E By repeatedly dipping the pipe into the syrupy liquid, Royal builds up a 30-pound, watermelon-size bubble of glass on the business end of the pipe. Next, the bubble-still colorless save for a menacing orange glow-is given a sheen of deep, brilliant turquoise by rolling it across a steel plate sprinkled with tinted glass dust, after which it is thrust into a second furnace, the "glory hole," which fuses the color to the piece.

A second layer of color--a leopardlike pattern of purple splotches-is similarly applied, and then the blowpipe is laid horizontally across a nearby workbench, where the shaping of the piece begins in earnest. Spinning the wobbly, semimolten bubble so that it doesn't droop off the end of the pipe, Royal begins by cooling the surface of the glass with a sponge of wet newspaper to give it a "skin"; as he does this, one assistant screens Royal's hands with a pair of fruitwood paddles to block the heat radiating from the glass, while another assistant kneels at the far end of the pipe and blows with all his might through its hollow core. His face flushed from his exertions, he slowly inflates the nascent objet d'art like a kid blowing up a gigantic wad of bubble gum.

Over the next hour, the pace of creation becomes increasingly frenetic, the dramatic tension more acute. The tiniest mistake can destroy the piece at any point during the complex process. Sweat dripping from their brows, Royal and his comrades carefully push and pull and carve away at the searing bubble to coax it into the desired shape, resorting to gravity and an arsenal of ingenious tools-some of them invented by Venetian glassblowers more than a thousand years ago, others devised only recently by Chihuly's crew.

Gathers of molten glass are repeatedly brought from the furnace, pulled like incandescent taffy into fragile coils and other embellishments, and bonded to the surface of the emerging sculpture. The crew is now in constant motion, working in alarmingly close proximity with flaring propane torches and blobs of dripping, red-hot glass; at times a dozen hands are flying over the piece at once. Each move is tightly choreographed, and the crew performs as smoothly as a crack team of cardiac surgeons. Nobody is burned.

"Glassblowing is tricky-a lot can go wrong"

Every two minutes throughout the entire process the piece must be carried from the workbench to the glory hole for reheating, lest the glass grow overly cool and become too brittle to work-or worse: the previous day, as it was nearing completion, an elaborate vaselike form worth tens of thousands of dollars cooled a little too much while being shaped at the bench, and consequently exploded when it was returned to the glory hole. It was the third piece that had bitten the dust that day. "Glassblowing is a tricky business, especially when you're pushing the edge of the envelope, when you're trying things this big and intricate," Royal explains philosophically. "A lot can go wrong. Some days everything you do turns out like magic and you're a hero; other days you lose most of the pieces you attempt.

While his craftsmen labor to transform molten glass into lasting art, Chihuly hovers nearby, offering words of advice and encouragement, cranking up the stereo to a window-rattling volume to stimulate the flow of creative juices. The rap music has been replaced by a Beatles CD. As the speakers blare, "Baby you can drive my car / Yes, I'm gonna be a star,"* the artist lip-syncs the lyrics, pumps the air with a raised fist, and executes a slick little dance step that would do Ickey Woods or Michael Jackson proud. "Oh boy, we've got ourselves a big unit here!" Chihuly calls out to Royal, admiring the three-foot-high piece. "We've got ourselves a nice one!"

Chihuly directs the work in the hot shop with a light touch. Indeed, once his sketches are tacked to the furnace wall and the blow is under way, the artist gives his team surprisingly free rein to interpret his ideas as they see fit. "I rely heavily on the intuition of my craftsmen," says Chihuly. It would be a mistake to try to exert too much control, I think it would kill the vital spark. Chance is a crucial ingredient-the unpredictability of the glass, of the colorist, of the gaffers. My ob is to be a catalyst-to set the wheels in motion, keep the energy level high, and let things happen. I love how every time these oven doors open you're presented with another surprise."

Chihuly doesn't apologize for the fact that he no longer blows the glass that bears his name. Louis Comfort Tiffany didn't craft his own pieces in the 19th century, nor, after his early years, did Tiffany's brilliant contemporary, the Frenchman Rene Lalique. A number of history's most hallowed painters and sculptors, including Michelangelo, Bernini and Rubens, relied on large teams of craftsmen or apprentices to assist in the execution of their art. The car crash that blinded Chihuly in one eye nearly killed him. "I went through the windshield in a bad way," he says. "A doctor put 250 stitches in my face. It took me six months to recuperate. The accident forced me to hand the blowpipe over to others, but you know, I think maybe I was ready to give it up anyway. You lose the big picture when you're sitting at the bench all day-"

Were Chihuly still sitting at the bench all day, he would also find it difficult to juggle the countless other affairs that absorb him intermittently throughout the course of the blow. In addition to the hot shop and the artist's palatial living quarters, the Boathouse shelters a gallery, a mock-up room (where the floor plans of distant galleries are replicated before every, show, so that pieces can be selected and arranged for optimal effect), a photography studio (Chihuly believes that pictures of his work are as important as the objects themselves, because so many more people can be exposed to the former), an extensive slide library and a bustling business office.

A stream of people trickles constantly through the hot shop with matters that require Chihuly's attention. Page proofs for a catalog need to be checked. A caller from Japan is on the line with a question about an upcoming installation in Kyoto. A fax from a museum in Czechoslovakia requires a reply. A mechanic wanders in with a progress report on a vintage Aston Martin DBII that Chihuly is having restored. An assistant hands Chihuly a finished, soon-to-be-shipped piece that needs the artist's signature. "I know it looks like I'm doing ten things simultaneously," Chihuly mutters somewhat defensively, "but actually I never do more than one thing at a time. I'm just good at shifting my focus quickly." With that, he picks up a mechanical engraving pencil, scrawls his John Henry on the proffered artwork, then scrutinizes the famous signature for a meditative beat before returning his attention to the steamy, clamorous act of creation now building toward a climax a few feet away.

At the workbench, Rich Royal is brandishing a propane torch, applying finishing touches to the work, which has been transferred from the blowpipe to an equally long steel rod called a punty. The air is thick with tension; to lose the piece now would be crushing. Somebody yells, "OK, let's do it!" and a worker named Brian Brenno hurries into a silvery fireproof suit, a matching plastic-faced hood and heavily insulated leather mittens. Walking up to the roaring maw of the glory hole, he shoves his gloved hands into the fire to scorch away all traces of moisture. Royal hefts the punty rod from the bench and rests the big, disturbingly fragile creation on a chest-high brace. Brenno, wearing an anxious expression, positions himself under it, hands raised, while Royal uses a pair of oversize metal forceps to score the base of the piece where it's joined to the punty. Royal taps the rod lightly once, twice, three times, and the 40-pound sculpture breaks free from the steel and drops into Brenno's waiting arms.

Grimacing from the heat and weight of the glass, Brenno wrestles the unwieldy object into a computer-controlled annealing oven. There, over a period of 36 hours, the temperature of the glass will gradually be brought down from 2,000 degrees to room temperature in order to reduce the likelihood that it will shatter as it cools. As the piece is laid safely inside and the oven door is shut, loud applause and cries of "Bravo!" erupt spontaneously from the 30-odd spectators who have gathered to witness the event. The tired crew then heads upstairs for a lunch of pasta washed down with shots of caffe correcto-high-octane espresso "corrected" with Sambuca, a potent licorice-flavored liqueur-to fortify themselves for the afternoon blow, when the whole demanding process begins again.

Thirty years ago it was all but impossible to find a serious artist or sculptor who worked in blown glass. Glassblowing was an industrialized craft; the medium had become the exclusive province of immense, highly mechanized factories dedicated to the mass production of utilitarian objects like kitchenware, wineglasses and laboratory flasks. There was a widely held belief in both art and industrial circles that high-quality glass simply could not be melted and blown without resorting to huge, superheated blast furnaces manned by a small army of technicians in a factory environment-a setting not overly conducive to spontaneous, unfettered artistic expression.

Enter Harvey Littleton, who in 1962 sparked a renaissance in art glass christened the "studio glass movement." A professor of ceramics at the University of Wisconsin, Littleton had grown up in the glass-making community of Corning, New York (his father was the director of research at the Corning Glass Works), and had long nurtured a stubborn conviction that blown glass held great potential as a medium for fine art. To demonstrate that potential, in March 1962, Littleton convened a glassblowing workshop in Ohio on the grounds of the Toledo Museum of Art.

Unfortunately, nobody at the workshop really knew what they were doing. The first batch of glass they cooked up wouldn't melt into a workable consistency, and the stoneware container in which it was being heated cracked in two. The prospects looked bleak until a friend of Littleton's named Dominick Labino came to the rescue. Labino, a brilliant industrial glass researcher whose glass-fiber developments would one day be used in the tiles on the exterior of the space shuttle, suggested changes to Littleton's furnace and donated a supply of "No. 475" marbles, a special glass he'd formulated that had an unusually low melting temperature. The marbles melted easily in the refurbished furnace and turned out to have a perfect consistency for glassblowing.

In the beginning, pitiful, lumpy shapes

Thanks to Labino, the Toledo workshop was a success, "probably as significant a moment in the history of glass as the time when glass was first blown," according to the art writer Paul Hollister. The fruits of that initial workshop were predictably crude and were described by various critics as "pitiful," "lumpy globby shapes ... .. heavy, thick vessels" and "numerous variations on the paperweight"-but Littleton had shown that glass could indeed be blown by independent artists working in small studios.

Giddy with excitement over the vast and unexploited creative terrain that suddenly beckoned as a consequence, that fall Littleton initiated a pilot program in glassblowing at the University of Wisconsin. By 1965, freshly minted alumni of that program had established similar courses of study at San Jose State University, the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Iowa, the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) and the Haystack Mountain School of Crafts on Deer Isle, Maine.

Twenty-five-year-old Dale Chihuly, a butcher's son from Tacoma, Washington, appeared on Littleton's Wisconsin doorstep in 1966. A year earlier, Chihuly had graduated from the University of Washington where he had experimented with weaving glass, and had gone to work as an interior designer for the largest architectural firm in Seattle. The Chihuly temperament, however, was ill-suited to being a small cog in a large corporate machine, and he already knew that he wanted to study glass. So he quit the firm, spent six months baiting hooks in the stern of an Alaska salmon troller, then used the stake he'd earned at sea to enroll in Littleton's postgraduate glass program. Chihuly realized that he'd found his calling, and proceeded to rearrange the embryonic landscape of glassblowing.

Chihuly was good, but nobody was interested in purchasing his art at the time, nor would they be for another nine or ten years. After obtaining his MS degree at Wisconsin, he went for an MFA at RISD, subsisting on a series of teaching assignments and foundation grants, including a Fulbright Fellowship that sent him to Italy in 1968, where he talked his way into an apprenticeship at the centuries-old Venini Glass Factory on the island of Murano in Venice, the first time an American had been granted such access. Following his Italian sojourn, Chihuly spent the winter months as the head of the glass program at RISD, and his summers teaching at the Haystack Mountain School in Maine.

Haystack was a spirited, free-thinking community where artisans from many different disciplines worked together against a backdrop of spectacular natural beauty. Chihuly loved the heady atmosphere, the constant stimulation, the creative sparks that flew from the convergence of so much talent in a single place. He began to hatch a scheme to found a similar school devoted exclusively to glass.

Armed with a $2,000 grant from the Union of Independent Colleges of Art, in the summer of 1971 he drove out to his childhood stamping grounds in Washington State to scout out a site. A friend introduced him to a timber baron named John Hauberg and his wife, Anne Gould Hauberg, who were looking for a way to contribute to the arts in the Northwest. Chihuly became enamored of their misty hilltop, 50 miles north of Seattle, with an expansive view of Puget Sound, the San Juan Islands and the craggy summits of the Olympic Mountains. It took little time for the Haubergs to be convinced that a glass art colony and their land were a perfect match and, later, to provide major financial support as well. It was decided to name the school-to-be for Pilchuck Creek, which crosses the property. A few days after the Haubergs approved the location, the charter class of 16 students arrived. They were informed that their first assignment was to build a hot shop. At the time, Pilchuck was nothing more than a clearing in the woods and a fire in Chihuly's belly: there were no buildings, no electricity, no facilities of any kind. "Many of the students wondered what they'd gotten themselves into," Chihuly confesses with a grin, "but we all pulled together and worked 20 hours a day. We built a nice little furnace under a canvas tarp hung from poles, sort of like a circus tent. Fourteen days after we started construction, we lit the shop and blew glass."

For the first two summers, Pilchuck was as much an Aquarian-age experiment in communal living as an art school. Students set up house in the forest under primitive-if imaginatively designed-shelters and cooked over open fires. According to Kate Elliott, who first attended Pilchuck in 1972 and has worked there as an administrator, "When I arrived I had no idea how to build any kind of shelter, and it rained the entire summer. Basically, I lived under a plastic bag. There were huge, disgusting slugs everywhere; we used to hold slug races." By all accounts it was an amazing experience, nonetheless. There was a tremendous esprit de corps, a sense that one was part of something momentous. Romances blossomed, wine flowed freely, people talked art and blew glass all day and all night.

Two decades later, Pilchuck has grown into a bona fide institution. The social life is somewhat less saturnalian, the stands of fir are noticeably taller, the flimsy shacks and tepees of yore have been replaced by striking clusters of glass-and-cedar buildings. Each summer 250 students currently attend the school in five sessions of 50 students each, and the faculty is drawn from the biggest names in glass worldwide. Indeed, Pilchuck has become the hub of the vast and continually expanding art-glass universe. With some 40 glass studios, the Puget Sound area boasts the greatest concentration of glassblowers this side of Murano.

As Pilchuck has matured, so have the artists who cut their teeth at the school. A number of them have emerged from Chihuly's shadow to share the limelight, among them Richard Royal, Ginny Ruffner, Curtiss Brock, Ann Gardner, Paul Marioni, Flora Mace and Joey Kirkpatrick, Benjamin Moore and, most notably, a sinewy 33-year-old glassblower named William Morris, who landed a job at Pilchuck as a truck driver in 1978 and is presently pegged by many as Chihuly's heir apparent. Now that there is money to be made in glass, the naivete and youthful exuberance of Pilchuck's early years have given way to increasingly commercial concerns. The Scattle art-glass community remains remarkably close-knit, but according to Elliott, "Things have definitely changed. The scene is getting too big to have everyone over for dinner anymore. You still see a lot of cooperation and mutual support-but only up to a point. Now that everybody's competing for a limited number of dollars, jealousles are starting to flare up. I think it's going to get even worse if the recession in the art market deepens."

But so far, demand for Chihuly's work continues to grow. Over the years, his creations have undergone several significant transformations of style. The Navajo Blanket Cylinders evolved into the more sophisticated Pilchuck Baskets, which were supplanted by the hugely popular Sea Forms-graceful, organic shapes in translucent hues, reminiscent of delicate scallop shells and rippling jellyfish-and then the fluid, garishly colored Macchias and Persians. Then came Chihuly's boldest series, the Venetians and the Putti: loud, shockingly voluptuous, completely over-the-top vases and jars adorned with kitschy gold cherubs and all manner of exotic glass flora. He is currently working on the Niijima Floats, huge inflated balls of glass. Chihuly's new works are challenging": even their fans admit that they have "a certain vulgarity that can put you off initially." Many glass collectors, in fact, privately wish he would go on making Sea Forms forever. But for his part, Chihuly really only cares about pushing the boundaries of glassblowing. And where that's going to take him nobody knows. Not even Chihuly.

Krakauer, J. "Dale Chihuly has turned art glass into a red-hot item." The Smithsonian. February 1, 1992.

1992 Betty Freudenheim:

"In the eyes of the organizers of the striking exhibition of glass at the Morris Museum, 30 years ago seems to be ancient history. The show, titled "Glass From Ancient Craft to Contemporary Art: 1962-1992 and Beyond," illustrates the many approaches that glass artists have actively explored in the last three decades.

It is all there. All the outstanding artists, all the innovative techniques and even predictions for the future. The glass glows with rich colors; the surfaces scintillate and reflect.

In the landmark year 1962, Harvey Littleton set up a workshop in a maintenance garage of the Toledo Museum of Art. His objective was to prove that glass could be blown in an artist's studio, without an expensive factory furnace. Dominick Labino, a glass scientist, provided technical expertise and glass with a low melting point.

The invited participants, who were all potters, blew glass around the clock for nine days. Although Otto Wittmann, who was then the director of the Toledo Museum, referred to the results as "pitifully few and inept," the workshop is eulogized as the starting point of the studio glass movement.

Karen S. Chambers, a curator of the Morris Museum show, describes an introductory display of early work as "naive" and "awkward." Some would disagree. A 1969 bottle by Sam Herman, one of Mr. Littleton's students, possesses the pure sensibility of truly ancient glass. It compares well with the Roman examples in the museum's permanent collection on the second floor.

Ms. Chambers, a writer-curator, and Ferdinand Hampson, founder of Habatat Galleries in Farmington Hills, Mich., and Boca Raton, Fla., selected nearly 100 examples by 67 artists. For the serious viewer, the all-inclusive aspect of the main gallery may add up to too much of a good thing. But the large installations can be studied as isolated works, and each one is worth the visit.

The first stop should be Mr. Littleton's "Pair of Ruby Blue Sliced Descending Forms," dated 1988. These elegantly arched ribbons of color resemble taffy after it has been pulled and twisted and pulled again. The analogy is correct; this is the very process he uses when the molten glass is taken from the furnace. "The twist is frozen in glass," he said.

Dale Chihuly, one of Mr. Littleton's best-known students, contributed five of his "Niijima Floats." These blown-glass spheres, in grays, black and gold, are flecked with bright hues. They are each more than 36 inches in diameter and weigh about 60 pounds. The name refers to the glass balls that Japanese fishermen use to keep their nets afloat. Mr. Chihuly's works are set on a 12-foot-square "sea" made from shards of broken bottles.

"The Power of Creativity," by Ginny Ruffner, has the dramatic urgency of a cyclone. A long swirl of aluminum wire, hung with glass droplets, appears to move like a strong wind blowing heavy rain across the gallery.

By contrast, Mary Van Cline's "Communication Waiting" provides a quiet respite, a few moments of silent meditation in a shadowy corner. She has set up a nearly life-sized photograph that is laminated onto glass. The scene shows a white-robed male figure seated facing the sun among the pebbles and rocks of a barren land. A sheet of black plate glass, lying on the floor, acts as a reflecting pool. There is an almost magnetic pull that attracts the viewer's eye across and through the transparent images. Yet the mind's eye turns inward.

Clifford Rainey's work also invites personal interpretations, but its title, "The Man Who Married the Moon," provides no obvious clues. Three heads of cast glass, which recall African sculpture, are set atop posts. One is red, the next black, the last gray. Oddly, their chins are all indented on the right side. The background is an Abstract Expressionist painting of crimson red and mottled gray. The large red circle on the canvas unifies the motifs and imbues the work with an enigmatic power.

A group of Mary Shaffer's clear glass tubes, which hangs from the ceiling, presents a delightful surprise. Look carefully for the thin strands of optic fiber hidden inside each one. The tips flicker on and off like fireflies on a warm summer's eve.

Bertil Vallien's seven-foot-tall "Pendulum" is suspended like an archaic symbol of the passage of time. The back surface, which is still coated with sand from the cast, implies that this is an artifact, dug up from the depths of the sea or a desert. There are always haunting mysteries to the work of this Swedish artist.

Some of the pieces seem much grander than their actual size. Steven Weinberg's 10-inch-square block of glass contains off-white platforms and stairs that lead nowhere. A tenuous fog seems to cling to every surface. This could be a mystical island setting for Shakespeare's "Tempest." A silver bubble, like the North Star, glows above this enchanted void.

Niyoko Ikuta creates seductive, undulating forms by stacking up layer upon layer of flat shapes cut from plate glass. The sides are striated with fine lines, like a loaf of sliced bread. If it were possible to look straight down into the core of this construction, the view would reveal an interior as clear as a pool of spring water.

There are also small works in a lighter vein. Richard Marquis's miniature "Crazy Quilt Teapot" looks just like its name. The glass lid, handle and spout are all in place. And what designs cover the surface? Tiny motifs of elephants, stars, stripes, polka dots and a cat.

"Pyramid III," by Marian Karel, is the ultimate illusion. It is simply an upright sheet of glass, held in place with two metal cables. The cables stretch from the corners of the platform to a center point at the top of the glass. Voila, the profile of a pyramid. A shadow on the wall reinforces the stark silhouette.

The final section predicting the future includes working drawings for large architectural commissions.

The exhibition continues through Nov. 22 and will then travel for two years to five museums in Oklahoma, Alabama, Texas and Arizona. The Morris Museum is at 6 Normandy Heights Road in Morristown. Hours are 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. Monday through Saturday and 1 to 5 P.M. Sunday. Admission is $4 for adults, or $2 for children and the elderly."

Freudenheim, B. "CRAFTS; Celebrating a Milestone In Glass Artistry" November 1, 1992. The New York Times. website accessed May 28, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/01/nyregion/crafts-celebrating-a-milestone-in-glass-artistry.html?pagewanted=2

1992 Rita Reif:

"There've never been so many finger marks to remove from our front window," said Joan McDonald, a spokeswoman for the American Craft Museum. The reason? The exhibition of Dale Chihuly's giant glass spheres, arranged on a bed of broken bottles.

Since early this year, when the Seattle glass artist installed the shimmering scene behind the museum's 20-foot-high window, a steady parade of people have been peering in, their hands and noses pressed against the panes. The 24 opaque balls -- half of them black, half milk-white -- are among the largest blown-glass bubbles ever made, ranging from a foot to a yard or more in diameter.

By day, washed by the sun, they look coolly elegant. At night, their iridescent surfaces glow in an eerie light, which gives them the look of color-splashed moon rocks. The environment remains at the Manhattan museum through Aug. 2.

Mr. Chihuly (pronounced chi-HOO-ly) calls the environment "Niijima Floats." He named it after the island near Tokyo where glass artisans once produced green floats, some as large as basketballs, that Japanese fishermen used to keep their nets afloat at sea. Mr. Chihuly, who is 50 years old, said he remembered finding such floats as a boy on beaches near his home in Tacoma, Wash.

"I liked the way the bed of broken bottles caught the light," Mr. Chihuly said of "Niijima Floats." "The clear glass fragments went perfectly with the black and white spheres and formed a natural barrier to keep people away."

The work, which was commissioned two years ago by the museum, changed several times. "Originally, Dale was going to stack the spheres," said Janet Kardon, director of the museum. But he decided not to after the gaffer and the glass team finished the first one. "I told Rich Royal and the team," Mr. Chihuly said, "to blow as big a ball as they could and to put a dimple in the end so we could stick a smaller ball on top of it and maybe attach some glass flowers. When it came out of the oven, I realized it looked pretty good on its own."

Making the largest of these glass objects requires the skills of 10 strong men at Mr. Chihuly's workshop in Seattle. The balls weigh up to 80 pounds apiece and are all slightly different in shape, size and color. "When you get up to these huge forms," Mr. Chihuly said, "you feel their strength and the breath that went into them."

An even larger grouping of Chihuly spheres -- about 40 -- is exhibited in "Dale Chihuly: Installations 1964-1992," at the Seattle Art Museum, through Aug. 16. These spheres comprise one of the glass environments in a show of 250 works that fill a space the size of a football field. The exhibition, which represents the largest survey of Chihuly work ever held, was financed by the Safeco Insurance Companies of Seattle.

"We wanted to celebrate a local artist whose work is known nationally," said Patterson Sims, the museum's curator of modern art and author of the catalogue ($19.95). "These are the longest days of the year, and the exhibition goes from natural light to pitch darkness."

The Seattle show documents the designer's lifelong explorations of the fluid capabilities of glass. Mr. Chihuly's undulating vases and sculptures, with their ruffled edges, biomorphic forms and variegated colorings, are reminiscent of tropical shells and flowers. Some of the larger works seem alive, changing as one watches. The most dramatic was an assemblage of neon-lighted towers in which the artist used not glass but 20,000 pounds of ice that melted slowly on a sidewalk in front of the museum during the first week of the show.

A more permanent creation of colorful glass pinwheels seems to cling like so many butterflies to the mullions of a window. And a huge chandelier -- eight feet high and five feet wide -- looks like a barrage of balloons at liftoff.

The exhibition includes not only actual works of art but also photographs of Mr. Chihuly's creations. Among the oversized color images is one depicting a work called "Glass Forest," which he created in 1971 when he was an assistant professor at the Rhode Island School of Design.

The fragile construction, which he made with James Carpenter, one of his students, combined white glass stalks and pretzel-twists of neon tubing. It was exhibited that year at the Museum of Contemporary Crafts, now the American Craft Museum. Mr. Chihuly still teaches occasionally, but at the Pilchuk Glass School, which he founded near Seattle in 1971. Last year, students from 25 countries attended.

What's next? "More spheres," the artist said. "But the setting is different." The spheres will stand out of doors in a courtyard at the Honolulu Academy of Art, placed downward on the grass so water cannot collect in them.

Mr. Chihuly is not saying what the colors will be and whether the shapes will change as the project proceeds. "We just like making something you've never seen before."

Reif, R. "Chihuly's Glass Spheres Are Worlds Unto Themselves" July 5, 1992. website accessed June 2, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/05/arts/arts-artifacts-chihuly-s-glass-spheres-are-worlds-unto-themselves.html